Escudo Universidad de Pamplona

Repositorio Institucional

Universidad de Pamplona

Preservamos, organizamos y difundimos la producción académica, científica, investigativa y cultural de la Universidad de Pamplona, garantizando el acceso abierto al conocimiento generado por nuestra comunidad universitaria.

Explorar colecciones

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://repositoriodspace.unipamplona.edu.co/jspui/handle/20.500.12744/12127
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorDuarte Álvarez, Andrés Giovanni.-
dc.contributor.authorPallares Carrascal, Néstor Anderson.-
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-29T17:00:09Z-
dc.date.available2021-
dc.date.available2026-10-29T17:00:09Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationDuarte Álvarez, A.G.; Pallares Carrascal, N.A. (2021). Los fundamentos morales de la ideología conservadora: una perspectiva desde la psicología política [Trabajo de Grado Pregrado, Universidad de Pamplona]. Repositorio Hulago Universidad de Pamplona. https://repositoriodspace.unipamplona.edu.co/jspui/handle/20.500.12744/12127es_CO
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositoriodspace.unipamplona.edu.co/jspui/handle/20.500.12744/12127-
dc.descriptionLa investigación en psicología política acerca del conservadurismo ha comenzado recientemente a emplear el modelo bifactorial que distingue entre la dimensión social y económica de esta ideología. En concordancia, el presente estudio de tipo correlacional sigue esta tendencia al evaluar una muestra de 471 participantes colombianos a través de una técnica de muestro por conveniencia con el fin de analizar la relación entre dos dimensiones el conservadurismo y la Teoría de los Fundamentos Morales. De esta manera, se encontró que las personas con ideología conservadora dan relevancia en sus procesos de razonamiento moral a los fundamentos vinculantes de Lealtad, Autoridad y Santidad. Adicionalmente, se discute la compleja interacción de ambas dimensiones del conservadurismo y sus implicaciones.es_CO
dc.description.abstractPolitical psychology research on conservatism has recently begun to use a two-factor model that distinguishes between the social and economic dimensions of this ideology. Hence, the present correlational study adheres to this trend by evaluating a sample of 471 Colombian participants through a convenience sampling technique to analyze the relationship between these two dimensions of conservatism and the Moral Foundations Theory. Consequently, it was found that conservatives give great relevance in their moral reasoning processes to the binding foundations of Loyalty, Authority and Sanctity. Additionally, the complex interaction of both dimensions of conservatism and its implications are discussed.es_CO
dc.format.extent61es_CO
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoeses_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de Pamplona - Facultad de Salud.es_CO
dc.subjectConservadurismo social.es_CO
dc.subjectConservadurismo económico.es_CO
dc.subjectFundamentos morales.es_CO
dc.subjectPolítica.es_CO
dc.subjectRazonamiento moral.es_CO
dc.titleLos fundamentos morales de la ideología conservadora: una perspectiva desde la psicología política.es_CO
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fes_CO
dc.date.accepted2021-
dc.relation.referencesAustin, D., & Jackson, M. (2019). Benevolent and hostile sexism differentially predicted by facets of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. Personality and individual differences, 139, 34-38.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesAvendaño, D. (2019). Las dimensiones del autoritarismo y su relación con la orientación política y los axiomas sociales. Tesis de grado. Universidad de Pamplona, Colombia.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesBarnett, M., Öz, H., & Marsden, A. (2017). Economic and Social Political Ideology and Homophobia: The Mediating Role of Binding and Individualizing Moral Foundations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(4), 1183–1194.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesBeltrán, W. (2012). Descripción cuantitativa de la pluralización religiosa en Colombia. Universitas Humanística, 73, 201-237.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesBrannen, J. (2017). Mixing methods: qualitative and quantitative research. Routledge.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesBobbio, A., Canova, L., & Manganelli, A. (2010). Conservative ideology, economic conservatism, and causal attributions for poverty and wealth. Current Psychology, 29(3), 222-234.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesCarney, R., & Enos, R. (2017). Conservatism and fairness in contemporary politics: Unpacking the psychological underpinnings of modern racism. In NYU CESS Experiments Conference, New York.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesCarney, D., Jost, J., Gosling, S., & Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29(6), 807–840.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesLos fundamentos morales del conservadurismo.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesCifras & Conceptos. (2017). Polimétrica. Recuperado de: https://urlzs.com/z5bWM.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesCoates, D., & Smith, K. (2012). The Oxford companion to American politics (Vol. 2). Oxford University Press.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesCottam, M., Mastors, E., Preston, T., & Dietz-Uhler, B. (2016). Introduction to political psychology (3rd Ed.). New York: Routledge.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesCrowson, H. (2009). Are All Conservatives Alike? A Study of the Psychological Correlates of Cultural and Economic Conservatism. The Journal of Psychology, 143(5), 449–463.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesDagnino, J. (2014). Coeficiente de correlación lineal de Pearson. Rev Chil Anest, 43, 150-153.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesDeutsch, N., & Kinvall, C. (2002). What is political psychology?. In K. R. Monroe (Ed.). Political Psychology. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesDomínguez-Lara, S. (2018). Magnitud del efecto, una guía rápida. Educación Médica, 19(4), 251- 254.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesDunwoody, P., & Funke, F. (2016). The Aggression-Submission-Conventionalism Scale: Testing a New Three Factor Measure of Authoritarianism. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(2), 571-600.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesEnelo, J. (2012). Conservative Distinctions: Moral and Cultural Conservatism. Praktiske Grunde, 4, 35-52.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesEtikan, I., Musa, S., & Alkassim, R. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesLos fundamentos morales del conservadurismo.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesEvans, A., Sleegers, W., & Mlakar, Ž. (2020). Individual differences in receptivity to scientific bullshit. Judgment and Decision Making, 15(3), 401.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesEverett, J. (2013). The 12-item social and economic conservatism scale (SECS). PloS one, 8(12), e82131.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesFasce, A., & Avendaño, D. (2020). Opening the can of worms: A comprehensive examination of authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 163. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110057.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesFederico, C., Weber, C., Ergun, D., & Hunt, C. (2013). Mapping the Connections between Politics and Morality: The Multiple Sociopolitical Orientations Involved in Moral Intuition. Political Psychology, 34(4), 589–610.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesFeldman, S., & Johnston, C. (2013). Understanding the Determinants of Political Ideology: Implications of Structural Complexity. Political Psychology, 35(3), 337–358.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesFrohnen, B., Beer, J., & Jeffrey, N. (2014). American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia. Open Road Media.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesGaitán, J., & Malagón, M. (2009). Fascismo y autoritarismo en Colombia. Vniversitas, 58(118), 293-316.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesGalindo, J. (2018). Las ideologías que marcan el voto en Colombia. Periódico El País. Recuperado de: https://urlzs.com/xYszP.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, P. (2015). Una panorámica de las encuestas web. Tesis de Maestría. Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa. Universidad de Granada, España. Recuperado de: https://urlzs.com/8d3aK.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesGraham, J., Haidt, J., Motyl, M., Meindl, P., Iskiwitch, C., & Mooijman, M. (2018). Moral foundations theory. In K. Gray & J. Graham, Atlas of moral psychology. The Guildford Press.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesGraham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029-1046.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesGraham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 55-130). Academic Press.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesGraham, J., Nosek, B., & Haidt, J. (2012). The moral stereotypes of liberals and conservatives: exaggeration of differences across the political spectrum. PLoS One, 7, e50092.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesGraham, J., Nosek, B., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of personality and social psychology, 101(2), 366-385.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesHaidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesHaidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98-116.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesHaidt, J., & Hersh, M. (2006). Sexual morality: The cultures and emotions of conservatives and liberals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(1), 191-221.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesHaidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133, 55–66.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesHannikainen, I., Miller, R., & Cushman, F. (2017). Act Versus Impact: Conservatives and Liberals Exhibit Different Structural Emphases in Moral Judgment. Ratio, 30(4), 462–493.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesHarnish, R., Bridges, K., & Gump, J. (2017). Predicting Economic, Social, and Foreign Policy Conservatism: the Role of Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Social Dominance Orientation, Moral Foundations Orientation, and Religious Fundamentalism. Current Psychology, 37(3), 668–679.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesHatemi, P., Crabtree, C., & Smith, K. (2019). Ideology justifies morality: Political beliefs predict moral foundations. American Journal of Political Science, 63(4), 788-806.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesHermann, M. (2002). Political psychology as a perspective in the study of politics. In K. R. Monroe (Ed.), Political psychology. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesHernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2010). Metodología de la investigación, (quinta edición). México: McGraw-Hill.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesHoughton, D. (2009). Political psychology: situations, individuals and cases. New York: Routledge.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesHoyt, C. L., Morgenroth, T., & Burnette, J. L. (2019). Understanding sexual prejudice: The role of political ideology and strategic essentialism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 49(1), 3- 14.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesHuddy, L., Sears, D., & Levy, J. (2013). The Oxford handbook of Political Psychology (2nd Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesJohnston, C., & Ollerenshaw, T. (2020). How different are cultural and economic ideology?. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 94-101.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesJost, J., Banaji, M., & Nosek, B. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political psychology, 25(6), 881-919.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesJost, J., Federico, C., & Napier, J. (2009). Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 307–337.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesKirk R (1953) The Conservative Mind: From Burke to Santayana. Chicago: Regnery.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesLatin American Public Opinion Project. (2016). Barómetro de las Américas, Colombia. Reporte 2016. Recuperado de: https://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/colombia.php.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMalka, A., Lelkes, Y., & Soto, C. (2019). Are cultural and economic conservatism positively correlated? A large-scale cross-national test. British Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 1045- 1069.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMcGuire, W. (2004). The Poly-Psy Relationship: Three Phases of a long Affair. In J. Jost and J. Sidanius (Eds.), Key readings in social psychology: political psychology. New York: Psychology Press.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMuñoz, P., & Gamboa, A. (2011). Configuración de lo político en la educación formal. Magistro, 5(9), 65-77.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMuñoz, P., & Gamboa, A. (2012). Escuela y educación política: una mirada a los imaginarios de actores educativos. Pedagogía y saberes, (36), 135-143.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesNapier, J., & Jost, J. (2008). The “antidemocratic personality” revisited: A cross‐national investigation of working‐class authoritarianism. Journal of Social Issues, 64(3), 595-617.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesPaolini, S., Harwood, J., & Rubin, M. (2010). Negative Intergroup Contact Makes Group Memberships Salient: Explaining Why Intergroup Conflict Endures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(12), 1723–1738.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesPoteat, V., & Mereish, E. (2012). Ideology, prejudice, and attitudes toward sexual minority social policies and organizations. Political Psychology, 33(2), 211-224.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesProch, J., Elad‐Strenger, J., & Kessler, T. (2018). Liberalism and Conservatism, for a Change! Rethinking the Association Between Political Orientation and Relation to Societal Change. Political Psychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12559.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesRíos, J., & Cairo, H. (2018). Los discursos sobre la participación política en el proceso de paz de Colombia. Araucaria, 39, 317-339.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesSánchez, E. (2017). El movimiento LGBT(I) en Colombia: la voz de la diversidad de género. Logros, retos y desafíos. Reflexión Política, 19(38), 116-131.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesShweder, R., Much, N., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt, & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119–169). New York: Routledge.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesStolerman, D., & Lagnado, D. (2018). The Moral Foundations of Human Rights Attitudes. Political Psychology. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12539.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesTorcello, L. (2020). Democracy and the Limits of Reason: Why a sustained defense of liberal commitments is necessary to counter democracy’s disinformation and xenophobia. Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin, 9(13).es_CO
dc.relation.referencesVillegas, G. (2015). Historia de los partidos políticos en Colombia. Via Inveniendi et Iudicandi, 10(1), 11-42.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesWilson, G. (2013). The psychology of conservatism. New York: Routledge.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesWitteveen, D. (2017). The rise of mainstream nationalism and xenophobia in Dutch politics. Journal of Labor and Society, 20(3), 373-378.es_CO
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2es_CO
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1es_CO
Aparece en las colecciones: Psicología

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Duarte_Pallares_2021_TG.pdfDuarte_Pallares_2021_TG.pdf703,95 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.