Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://repositoriodspace.unipamplona.edu.co/jspui/handle/20.500.12744/4990Registro completo de metadatos
| Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Tolosa López, Silvia Juliana. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-01T17:46:49Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-09-05 | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-12-01T17:46:49Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Tolosa López, S.J. (2020). Efectividad de los métodos de evaluación fonético acústico para el diagnóstico de la disfonía en adultos y adultos mayores. [Trabajo de Grado Pregrado, Universidad de Pamplona]. Repositorio Hulago Universidad de Pamplona. http://repositoriodspace.unipamplona.edu.co/jspui/handle/20.500.12744/4990 | es_CO |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repositoriodspace.unipamplona.edu.co/jspui/handle/20.500.12744/4990 | - |
| dc.description | INTRODUCCIÓN: La disfonía es un trastorno de la voz que ocurre cuando la calidad, el tono y el volumen de esta difieren, su evaluación puede ser subjetiva y objetiva, destacando dentro de los procedimientos objetivos, dos métodos recientemente desarrollados para cuantificar la gravedad de la disfonía, la medida de prominencia cepstral suavizada (CPPS) y el índice de calidad de la voz acústica (AVQI); el objetivo de este estudio consiste en determinar la precisión diagnostica del (AVQI) en relación a la (CPPS) en la evaluación de la voz sostenida y continua MÉTODOS: se realizó una revisión sistemática metanalitica mediante una búsqueda de literatura y análisis estadístico de la información hallada RESULTADOS: la prueba (AVQI) demuestra ser más específica pero menos sensible que la prueba de referencia estándar. El (AVQI) tiene mayor capacidad diagnostica con valores de Odds Ratio de 42,55 en relación a 22,74 de la prueba (CPPS) ANÁLISIS Y DISCUSIÓN: la heterogeneidad de la evidencia encontrada y precisión diagnostica de las pruebas objeto de estudio, permite determinar que la AVQI es más heterogénea que la (CPSS), sin embargo es más precisa en la evaluación y diagnóstico de la voz CONCLUSIONES: El (AVQI) mostró ser la medida acústica más robusta para la evaluación y el diagnóstico de la severidad de la disfonía; puesto que, abarca seis marcadores acústicos que miden a nivel global la calidad de la voz sostenida y continua. | es_CO |
| dc.description.abstract | INTRODUCTION: Dysphonia is a voice disorder that occurs when the quality, tone and volume of this difference, its evaluation can be subjective and objective, highlighting within the objective procedures, two recently developed methods to quantify the severity of the dysphonia, the smoothed cepstral prominence measure (CPPS) and the acoustic voice quality index (AVQI); the objective of this study is to determine the diagnostic precision (AVQI) in relation to the (CPPS) in the evaluation of the sustained and continuous voice METHODS: a systematic systematic review was performed through a literature search and statistical analysis of the information RESULTS: found the test (AVQI) proves to be more specific but less sensitive than the standard reference test. The (AVQI) has greater diagnostic capacity with Odds Ratio values of 42.55 in relation to 22.74 of the test (CPPS). ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION: the heterogeneity of the evidence found and the diagnostic precision of the tests under study, allows determine that the AVQI is more heterogeneous than the (CPSS), however it is more precise in the evaluation and diagnosis of the voice CONCLUSIONS: The (AVQI) demonstrated the most robust acoustic measure for the evaluation and diagnosis of the severity of dysphonia since it encompasses six acoustic markers that globally measure sustained and continuous voice quality. | es_CO |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | es_CO |
| dc.language.iso | es | es_CO |
| dc.publisher | Universidad de Pamplona – Facultad de Salud. | es_CO |
| dc.subject | Adulto. | es_CO |
| dc.subject | Sensibilidad. | es_CO |
| dc.subject | Acústica. | es_CO |
| dc.subject | Voz. | es_CO |
| dc.subject | Disfonía. | es_CO |
| dc.subject | Especificidad. | es_CO |
| dc.title | Efectividad de los métodos de evaluación fonético acústico para el diagnóstico de la disfonía en adultos y adultos mayores. | es_CO |
| dc.type | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f | es_CO |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-06-05 | - |
| dc.relation.references | Lara Peinado A, Sistiaga Surez JA. Patología de la voz. Med - Programa Form M?dica Contin Acreditado [Internet]. 2007 Nov [cited 2019 Jul 11];9(91):5876–84. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0211344907747495 | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Mahalingam S, Boominathan P, Arunachalam R, Venkatesh L, Srinivas S. Cepstral Measures to Analyze Vocal Fatigue in Individuals With Hyperfunctional Voice Disorder. J Voice. 2020 Mar 14; | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Hernández-Jaramillo J, Cruz-Velandia I, Torres-Narváez M. INVESTIGACIÓN CLÍNICA EN FONOAUDIOLOGÍA: ANÁLISIS DE LA LITERATURA CIENTÍFICA. Vol. 58, Investigación clínica en Fonoaudiología Hernández J y cols. Rev.Fac.Med. 2010. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Lopes LW, da Silva JD, Simões LB, Evangelista D da S, Silva POC, Almeida AA, et al. Relationship Between Acoustic Measurements and Self-evaluation in Patients With Voice Disorders. J Voice. 2017 Jan 1;31(1):119.e1-119.e10. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Ziwei Y, Zheng P, Pin D. Multiparameter voice assessment for voice disorder patients: A correlation analysis between objective and subjective parameters. J Voice. 2014 Nov 1;28(6):770–4. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Barsties v. Latoszek B, Lehnert B, Janotte B. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in German. J Voice. 2020 Jan 1;34(1):157.e17-157.e25. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Constanza M, Otálora S, Molina Béjar R, Matus NC, Dotor LD, Torres LN. PERFIL Y COMPETENCIAS PROFESIONALES DEL FONOAUDIÓLOGO EN COLOMBIA EQUIPO DE TRABAJO. 2014 | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | EL CONGRESO DE COLOMBIA. LEY 376 DE 1997 [Internet]. Por la cual se reglamenta la profesión de Fonoaudiología y se dictan normas para su ejercicio en Colombia. . 1997 [cited 2020 Apr 28]. p. 1–3. Available from: https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/articles-105005_archivo_pdf.pdf | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Madill C, Nguyen DD, Eastwood C, Heard R, Warhurst S. Comparison of Cepstral Peak Prominence Measures Using the ADSV, SpeechTool, and VoiceSauce Acoustic Analysis Programs in Vocally Healthy Female Speakers. Acoust Aust. 2018 Aug 1;46(2):215–26. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Brockmann-Bauser M, Van Stan JH, Carvalho Sampaio M, Bohlender JE, Hillman RE, Mehta DD. Effects of Vocal Intensity and Fundamental Frequency on Cepstral Peak Prominence in Patients with Voice Disorders and Vocally Healthy Controls. J Voice. 2019 Dec 17; | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Uloza V, Petrauskas T, Padervinskis E, Ulozaitė N, Barsties B, Maryn Y. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language. J Voice. 2017 Mar 1;31(2):257.e1-257.e11. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Lee JM, Roy N, Peterson E, Merrill RM. Comparison of Two Multiparameter Acoustic Indices of Dysphonia Severity: The Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia. J Voice. 2018 Jul 1;32(4):515.e1-515.e13 | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Barsties B, De Bodt M. Assessment of voice quality: Current state-of-the-art. Auris Nasus Larynx [Internet]. 2015 Jun [cited 2018 Dec 2];42(3):183–8. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0385814614002053 | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Garcia-Alamino JM, Lopez-Cano M. Systematic reviews with meta-analysis of clinical trials: Is there enough evidence? Cir Esp. 2020 Jan 1;98(1):4–8. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Garzón Segura, Anni Marcela; Penagos López LA. DISPONIBILIDAD LÉXICA EN ESTUDIANTES DE PRIMER SEMESTRE DE PREGRADO DE UNA INSTITUCIÓN UNIVERSITARIA DE VILLAVICENCIO, COLOMBIA. Red Rev Científicas América Lat el Caribe, España y Port. 2016;29(0120-338X):63–84. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Ferreira González I, Urrútia G, Alonso-Coello P. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Scientific rationale and interpretation. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011 Aug 1;64(8):688–96. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Quirino EMB, Pinho CM, Silva MAS, Dourado CARO, Lima MCL de, Andrade MS. Perfil epidemiológico e clínico de casos de microcefalia. Enfermería Glob. 2019 Dec 20;19(1):167–208. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Ciapponi A. QUADAS-2: instrumento para la evaluación de la calidad de estudios de precisión diagnóstica QUADAS-2: an instrument for the evaluation of the quality of diagnostic precision studies [Internet]. [cited 2020 Apr 26]. Available from: http://www.bris.ac.uk/quadas | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Yanji Q, Zhirong Y, Feng S, Siyan Z. Risk on bias assessment: (6) a revised tool for the quality assessment on diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2). Chinese J Endem. 2018 Apr 1;39(4):524–31. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Aguayo-Albasini JL, Flores-Pastor B, Soria-Aledo V. Sistema GRADE: Clasificación de la calidad de la evidencia y graduación de la fuerza de la recomendación. Cir Esp. 2014 Feb 1;92(2):82–8. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Carmona G, Bonilla C, Huamán K, Reye N, Hijar G, Caballero P. Use of deliberative dialogues for the formulation of recommendations for clinical practice guidelines. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2017 Oct 1;34(4):738–43. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Taveira KVM, Santos RS, Leão BLC de, Stechman Neto J, Pernambuco L, Silva LK da, et al. Diagnostic validity of methods for assessment of swallowing sounds: a systematic review. Vol. 84, Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. Elsevier Editora Ltda; 2018. p. 638–52. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Rocío Del Valle Benavides A, Manuel J, Pichardo M. Curvas ROC (Receiver-Operating-Characteristic) y sus aplicaciones. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Molina Arias Ma. Aspectos metodológicos del metaanálisis . Rev Pediatr Aten Primaria [Internet]. 2018 Oct [cited 2020 May 19];1–6. Available from: http://archivos.pap.es/Empty/PAP/front/Articulos/Imprimir/_OrCjUxDG4croFblaIuWJH2fF0HqiaKTEU8xQBE28BbI | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Sauder C, Bretl M, Eadie T. Predicting Voice Disorder Status From Smoothed Measures of Cepstral Peak Prominence Using Praat and Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice (ADSV). J Voice. 2017 Sep 1;31(5):557–66. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Heman-Ackah YD, Sataloff RT, Laureyns G, Lurie D, Michael DD, Heuer R, et al. Quantifying the cepstral peak prominence, a measure of dysphonia. J Voice. 2014 Nov 1;28(6):783–8. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Awan SN, Awan JA. A Two-Stage Cepstral Analysis Procedure for the Classification of Rough Voices. J Voice. 2020 Jan 1;34(1):9–19. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Kim GH, Bae IH, Park HJ, Lee YW. Comparison of Cepstral Analysis Based on Voiced-Segment Extraction and Voice Tasks for Discriminating Dysphonic and Normophonic Korean Speakers. J Voice. 2019;0(0). | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Delgado-Hernández J, León-Gómez N, Jiménez-álvarez A. Diagnostic accuracy of the Smoothed Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPPS) in the detection of dysphonia in the Spanish language. Loquens. 2019;6(1). | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Núñez-Batalla F, Cartón-Corona N, Vasile G, García-Cabo P, Fernández-Vañes L, Llorente-Pendás JL. Validation of the measures of cepstral peak prominence as a measure of dysphonia severity in Spanish-speaking subjects. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2019 Jul 1;70(4):222–8. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Kitayama I, Hosokawa K, Iwahashi T, Iwahashi M, Iwaki S, Kato C, et al. Intertext Variability of Smoothed Cepstral Peak Prominence, Methods to Control It, and Its Diagnostic Properties. J Voice. 2018 May 1;34(3):305–19 | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Kishore Pebbili G, Shabnam S, Pushpavathi M, Rashmi J, Gopi Sankar R, Nethra R, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.03 in Discriminating across the Perceptual Degrees of Dysphonia Severity in Kannada Language. J Voice. 2019 Sep 19; | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Hosokawa K, Barsties B, Iwahashi T, Iwahashi M, Kato C, Iwaki S, et al. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language. J Voice. 2017 Mar 1;31(2):260.e1-260.e9. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Kim GH, Lee YW, Bae IH, Park HJ, Wang SG, Kwon SB. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Korean Language. J Voice. 2019 Nov 1;33(6):948.e1-948.e9. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Englert M, Barsties v. Latoszek B, Maryn Y, Behlau M. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, to the Brazilian Portuguese Language. J Voice. 2019; | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Kankare E, Barsties V. Latoszek B, Maryn Y, Asikainen M, Rorarius E, Vilpas S, et al. The acoustic voice quality index version 02.02 in the Finnish-speaking population. Logop Phoniatr Vocology. 2019; | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Crespo N, Rivera E, Figueroa F, Chacón K, López L, Gonzalez S. MÉTODOS DE EVALUACIÓN DE LA VOZ EN DOCENTES UNA REVISIÓN SISTEMÁTICA. Rev CIENTÍFICA SIGNOS FÓNICOS [Internet]. 2018 Jun 7 [cited 2019 Aug 2];3(1). Available from: http://revistas.unipamplona.edu.co/ojs_viceinves/index.php/CDH/article/view/2875 | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Crestani S, Woisard V. Exploración de la laringe. EMC - Otorrinolaringol. 2014 Apr 1;43(2):1–14 | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Balasubramanium RK, Karuppali S, Bajaj G, Shastry A, Bhat J. Acoustic-Perceptual Correlates of Voice in Indian Hindu Purohits. J Voice. 2019 Sep 1;33(5):804.e1-804.e4. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | de Almeida SC, Mendes AP, Kempster GB. The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Psychometric Characteristics: II European Portuguese Version (II EP CAPE-V). J Voice. 2019 Jul 1;33(4):582.e5- 582.e13. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Vaz Freitas S, Pestana PM, Almeida V, Ferreira A. Audio-perceptual evaluation of portuguese voice disorders - An inter- and intrajudge reliability study. J Voice. 2014 Mar 1;28(2):210–5. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Iwarsson J, Bingen-Jakobsen A, Johansen DS, Kølle IE, Pedersen SG, Thorsen SL, et al. Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Dysphonia: A Comparison Between Narrow and Broad Terminology Systems. J Voice. 2018 Jul 1;32(4):428–36. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Skowronski MD, Shrivastav R, Hunter EJ. Cepstral Peak Sensitivity: A Theoretic Analysis and Comparison of Several Implementations. J Voice. 2015 Nov 1;29(6):670–81. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Batthyany C, Maryn Y, Trauwaen I, Caelenberghe E, van Dinther J, Zarowski A, et al. A case of specificity: How does the acoustic voice quality index perform in normophonic subjects? Appl Sci. 2019 Jun 1;9(12). | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Barsties B, Maryn Y. The improvement of internal consistency of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index. Am J Otolaryngol - Head Neck Med Surg. 2015 Sep 1;36(5):647–56. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Díaz AD BCCS. ¿Son suficientes los indicadores del rendimiento de una prueba o test diagnóstico para evaluar su desempeño? Rev Cuba Med Gen Integr [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 May 23];3(34):94–109. Available from: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=89064 | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Maryn Y, Weenink D. Objective dysphonia measures in the program praat: Smoothed cepstral peak prominence and acoustic voice quality index. J Voice. 2015 Jan 1;29(1):35–43 | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Reghunathan S, Bryson PC. Components of Voice Evaluation. Vol. 52, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. W.B. Saunders; 2019. p. 589–95. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Watts CR, Awan SN, Maryn Y. A Comparison of Cepstral Peak Prominence Measures From Two Acoustic Analysis Programs. J Voice. 2017 May 1;31(3):387.e1-387.e10. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Núñez-Batalla F, Díaz-Fresno E, Álvarez-Fernández A, Muñoz Cordero G, Llorente Pendás JL. Aplicación del índice S. Tolosa López, M. Mogollón Tolosa acústico de calidad vocal para la cuantificación objetiva de la severidad de la disfonía. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2017 Jul 1;68(4):204–11. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Gaskill CS, Awan JA, Watts CR, Awan SN. Acoustic and Perceptual Classification of Within-sample Normal, Intermittently Dysphonic, and Consistently Dysphonic Voice Types. J Voice. 2017 Mar 1;31(2):218–28 | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Hasanvand A, Salehi A, Ebrahimipour M. A Cepstral Analysis of Normal and Pathologic Voice Qualities in Iranian Adults: A Comparative Study. J Voice. 2017 Jul 1;31(4):508.e17-508.e23. | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Faham M, Laukkanen AM, Ikävalko T, Rantala L, Geneid A, Holmqvist-Jämsén S, et al. Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a Potential Tool for Voice Screening. J Voice. 2019 Sep 30; | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Faham M, Laukkanen AM, Ikävalko T, Rantala L, Geneid A, Holmqvist-Jämsén S, et al. Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a Potential Tool for Voice Screening. J Voice. 2019; | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Pommée T, Maryn Y, Finck C, Morsomme D. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French. J Voice. 2018 Dec 28; | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Kishore Pebbili G, Shabnam S, Pushpavathi M, Rashmi J, Gopi Sankar R, Nethra R, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.03 in Discriminating across the Perceptual Degrees of Dysphonia Severity in Kannada Language. J Voice. 2019; | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Teixeira JP, Gonçalves A. Accuracy of Jitter and Shimmer Measurements. Procedia Technol [Internet]. 2014 Jan 1 [cited 2018 Dec 1];16:1190–9. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212017314003612 | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Núñez Batalla F, González Márquez R, Peláez González MB, González Laborda I, Fernández Fernández M, Morato Galán M. Análisis acústico de la voz mediante el progama Praat: estudio comparativo con el programa Dr. Speech. Acta Otorrinolaringológica Española [Internet]. 2014 May 1 [cited 2018 Dec 1];65(3):170–6. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001651914000247?via%3Dihub | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Jonathan Delgado Hernández NMLGAJRLIA. Análisis acústico de la voz: medidas temporales, espectrales y cepstrales en la voz normal con el Praat en una muestra de hablantes de español - Dialnet. 2017 [cited 2019 Nov 29];108–27. Available from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6235178 | es_CO |
| dc.relation.references | Higgins JPT GS. Manual Cochrane de revisiones sistemáticas de intervenciones [Internet]. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 . 2011 [cited 2020 May 21]. p. 1–639. Available from: https://es.cochrane.org/sites/es.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/manual_cochrane_510_web.pdf | es_CO |
| dc.rights.accessrights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | es_CO |
| dc.type.coarversion | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 | es_CO |
| Aparece en las colecciones: | Fonoaudiología | |
Ficheros en este ítem:
| Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tolosa_2020_TG.pdf | Tolosa_2020_TG | 1,47 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.