Escudo Universidad de Pamplona

Repositorio Institucional

Universidad de Pamplona

Preservamos, organizamos y difundimos la producción académica, científica, investigativa y cultural de la Universidad de Pamplona, garantizando el acceso abierto al conocimiento generado por nuestra comunidad universitaria.

Explorar colecciones

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://repositoriodspace.unipamplona.edu.co/jspui/handle/20.500.12744/11296
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorMorantes Páez, Henry Armando.-
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-29T21:10:39Z-
dc.date.available2022-
dc.date.available2026-09-29T21:10:39Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationMorantes Páez, H. A. (2022). Gestión de Ingeniería de Mantenimiento básica del banco de neumática del Laboratorio GM - 105 de la Sede de Villa del Rosario de la Universidad de Pamplona [Trabajo de Grado Pregrado, Universidad de Pamplona]. Repositorio Hulago Universidad de Pamplona. https://repositoriodspace.unipamplona.edu.co/jspui/handle/20.500.12744/11296es_CO
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositoriodspace.unipamplona.edu.co/jspui/handle/20.500.12744/11296-
dc.descriptionEste proyecto tiene como finalidad el desarrollo e implementación de un protocolo de mantenimiento para el Banco de Neumática ubicado en el Laboratorio de Mecatrónica GM 105 en la Universidad de Pamplona sede Villa del Rosario, que permita un desempeño optimo en el proceso de aprendizaje y experiencia Industrial por parte de los estudiantes. Dado a que el sistema actual carece de un protocolo de mantenimiento se pretende instaurar medidas de mantenimiento basándonos en las condiciones de uso de fábrica. Esto con el fin de implementar nuevamente actividades de uso académico en las instalaciones. Para esto, se debe realizar un estado del arte y a su vez la investigación y manipulación de la información actualmente relacionada a su uso en dicho laboratorio, al comportamiento histórico de los componentes del Banco de Neumática, tales como su actual compresor, actuadores, terminales, controladores y demás componentes que serán enmarcados teóricamente para generar un contexto solido sobre el proyecto y así proceder a desarrollar e implementar el protocolo de mantenimiento industrial ya mencionado de dicho sistema. Con este proyecto se pretende extender la vida útil de los implementos de manera individual y a su vez como un sistema completo que garanticen el continuo uso adecuado y controlado de los activos ya mencionados a tratar en el proyecto.es_CO
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this project is the development and implementation of a maintenance protocol for the Pneumatics Bench located in the GM 105 Mechatronics Laboratory at the University of Pamplona, Villa del Rosario, which allows optimal performance in the learning process and Industrial experience. by the students. Given that the current system lacks a maintenance protocol, it is intended to establish maintenance measures based on the factory conditions of use. This in order to once again implement activities for academic use in the facilities. For this, a state of the art must be carried out and, in turn, the investigation and manipulation of the information currently related to its use in said laboratory, to the historical behavior of the components of the Pneumatics Bank, such as its current compressor, actuators, terminals, controllers and other components that will be theoretically framed to generate a solid context about the project and thus proceed to develop and implement the aforementioned industrial maintenance protocol of said system. With this project it is intended to extend the useful life of the implements individually and in turn as a complete system that guarantees the continuous adequate and controlled use of the aforementioned assets to be treated in the project.es_CO
dc.format.extent63es_CO
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoeses_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de Pamplona - Facultad de Ingenierías y Arquitectura.es_CO
dc.subjectProtocolo.es_CO
dc.subjectMantenimiento industrial.es_CO
dc.subjectNeumática.es_CO
dc.subjectCompresores.es_CO
dc.subjectPistones.es_CO
dc.titleGestión de Ingeniería de Mantenimiento básica del banco de neumática del Laboratorio GM - 105 de la Sede de Villa del Rosario de la Universidad de Pamplona.es_CO
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fes_CO
dc.date.accepted2022-
dc.relation.referencesAboelmaged, M., 2015. E-maintenance research: a multifaceted perspective. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 26 (5), 606–631.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesAgustiady, T., Cudney, E., 2018. Total, productive maintenance. Total, Qual. Manag. Bus. Excel. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1438843 (forthcoming.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesAhuja, I., Khamba, J., 2008a. Justification of total productive maintenance initiatives in Indian manufacturing industry for achieving core competitiveness. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 19 (5), 645–669.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesAhuja, I., Khamba, J., 2008b. Total productive maintenance: literature review and directions. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 25 (7), 709–756.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesAli, A., 2019. Application of total productive maintenance in service organization. International Journal of Research in Industrial Engineering 8 (2), 176–186.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesAl-Najjar, B., Algabroun, H., Jonsson, M., 2018. Maintenance 4.0 to fulfil the demands of industry 4.0 and factory of the future. Int. J. Eng. Res. Afr. 8 (11), 20–31.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesAshton, K., 2009. That ’internet of things’ thing. RFID Journal 22, 97–114.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesBarratt, M., Choi, T., Li, M., 2011. Qualitative case studies in operations management: trends, research outcomes, and future research implications. J. Oper. Manag. 29 (4), 329–342.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesBell, E., Bryman, A., Harley, B., 2018. Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press, London.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesBokrantz, J., Skoogh, A., Berlin, C., Stahre, J., 2017. Maintenance in digitalised manufacturing: delphi-based scenarios for 2030. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 191, 154–169.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesBokrantz, J., Skoogh, A., Berlin, C., Wuest, T., Stahre, J., 2020b. Smart Maintenance: an empirically grounded conceptualization. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 223, 107534.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesBokrantz, J., Skoogh, A., Berlin, C., Wuest, T., Stahre, J., 2020a. Smart Maintenance: a research agenda for industrial maintenance management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 224, 107547.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesBouwman, H., Van Den Hooff, B., Van den Wijngaert, L., Van Dijk, 2005. J. Information And Communication Technology In Organizations. Sage, London.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesBrah, S.A., Chong, W.K., 2004. Relationship between total productive maintenance and performance. Int. J. Prod. Res. 42 (12), 2383–2401.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesBrazilian National Industry Confederation, 2017. Ranking dos estados. Available at: https://perfildaindustria.portaldaindustria.com.br/ranking (accessed on January 12th 2021).es_CO
dc.relation.referencesCarter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., Neville, A., 2014. The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol. Nurs. Forum 41 (5).es_CO
dc.relation.referencesCarvalho, T., Soares, F., Vita, R., Francisco, R., Basto, J., Alcal´ a, S., 2019. A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesComput. Ind. Eng. 137, 106024.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesCeruti, A., Marzocca, P., Liverani, A., Bil, C., 2019. Maintenance in aeronautics in an industry 4.0 context: the role of augmented reality and additive manufacturing. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering 6 (4), 516–526.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesChiarini, A., Belvedere, V., Grando, A., 2020. Industry 4.0 strategies and technological developments. An exploratory research from Italian manufacturing companies. Prod. Plann. Contr. 31 (16), 1385–1398.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesChukwuekwe, D., Schjoelberg, P., Roedseth, H., Stuber, A., 2016. Reliable, robust and resilient systems: towards development of a predictive maintenance concept within the industry 4.0 environment. EFNMS Euro Maintenance Conference.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesCiano, M., Dallasega, P., Orzes, G., Rossi, T., 2021. One-to-one relationships between Industry 4.0 technologies and Lean Production techniques: a multiple case study. Int. J. Prod. Res. 59 (5), 1386–1410.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesCorbin, J., Strauss, A., 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage, London.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesCresswell, K., Sheikh, A., 2013. Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: an interpretative review. Int. J. Med. Inf. 82 (5), 73–86. Cua, K.O., McKone, K.E., Schroeder, R.G., 2001. Relationships between implementation of TQM, JIT, and TPM and manufacturing performance. J. Oper. Manag. 19 (6), 675–694.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesCusano, C., Napoletano, P., 2017. Visual recognition of aircraft mechanical parts for smart maintenance. Comput. Ind. 86, 26–33.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesDa Silveira, G.J.C., 2001. Innovation diffusion: research agenda for developing economies. Technovation 21, 767–773.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesDalenogare, L., Benitez, G., Ayala, N., Frank, A., 2018. The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 204, 383–394.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesDalzochio, J., Kunst, R., Pignaton, E., Binotto, A., Sanyal, S., Favilla, J., Barbosa, J., 2020. Machine learning and reasoning for predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0: current status and challenges. Comput. Ind. 123, 103298.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesDe Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L., Jabbour, C.J.C., Foropon, C., Godinho Filho, M., 2018. When titans meet–Can industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 132, 18–25.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesDooley, K.E., 1999. Towards a holistic model for the diffusion of educational technologies: an integrative review of educational innovation studies. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2 (4), 35–45. Dub´e, L., Par´e, G., 2003. Rigor in information systems positivist case research: current practices, trends and recommendations. MIS Q. 27 (4), 597–635.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesFatorachian, H., Kazemi, H., 2018. A critical investigation of Industry 4.0 in manufacturing: theoretical operationalisation framework. Prod. Plann. Contr. 29 (8), 633–644.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesFettermann, D., Cavalcante, C., Almeida, T., Tortorella, G., 2018. How does Industry 4.0 contribute to operations management? Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering 35 (4), 255–268.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesFrank, A., Dalenogare, L., Ayala, N., 2019. Industry 4.0 technologies: implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 210, 15–26.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesFurlan, A., Vinelli, A., Dal Pont, G., 2011. Complementarity and lean manufacturing bundles: an empirical analysis. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 31 (8), 835–850.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesGhobakhloo, M., 2018. The future of manufacturing industry: a strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.0. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 29 (6), 910–936.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesGreenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., Kyriakidou, O., 2004. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 82 (4), 581–629.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesGuest, G., Namey, E., Taylor, J., Eley, N., McKenna, K., 2017. Comparing focus groups and individual interviews: findings from a randomized study. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 20 (6), 693–708.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesHabidin, N., Hashim, S., Fuzi, N., Salleh, M., 2018. Total productive maintenance, kaizen event, and performance. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 35 (9), 1853–1867.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesHermann, M., Pentek, T., Otto, B., 2016. Design principles for industrie 4.0 scenarios. In: 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE, pp. 3928–3937.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesHooi, L., Leong, T.Y., 2017. Total, productive maintenance and manufacturing performance improvement. J. Qual. Mainten. Eng. 23 (1), 2–21.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesHopkins, J., 2021. An investigation into emerging industry 4.0 technologies as drivers of supply chain innovation in Australia. Comput. Ind. 125, 103323. Ç.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesHubl, A., Altendorfer, K., Pilstl, J., Jodlbauer, H., 2009. Equipment performance measurement in production plants based on customer demand. 2009 2nd International Symposium on Logistics and Industrial Informatics. IEEE, pp. 1–6.es_CO
dc.relation.referenceshttps://www.equiposylaboratorio.com/portal/articulo-ampliado/el-analisis-de-criticidad-una-metodologia-para-mejorar-la-confiabilidad-operacional#:~:text=Los%20criterios%20para%20realizar%20un,puntuaci%C3%B3n%20para%20cada%20elemento%20evaluado.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesJabbour, C.J.C., de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L., Sarkis, J., Godinho Filho, M., 2019. Unlocking the circular economy through new business models based on large-scale data: an integrative framework and research agenda. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 144, 546-542.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesJain, A., Bhatti, R., Singh, H., 2014. Total, productive maintenance (TPM) implementation practice: a literature review and directions. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 5 (3), 293–323.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesJiang, Y., Chen, M., Zhou, D., 2015. Joint optimization of preventive maintenance and inventory policies for multi-unit systems subject to deteriorating spare part inventory. J. Manuf. Syst. 35, 191–205.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesKagermann, H., 2015. Change through digitization—value creation in the age of Industry 4.0. Management of Permanent Change. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp. 23–45.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesKaminski, J., 2011. Diffusion of innovation theory. Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics 6 (2), 1–6.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesKaur, M., Singh, K., Ahuja, I., Singh, P., 2015. Justification of synergistic implementation of TQM–TPM paradigms using analytical hierarchy process. Int. J. Process Manag. Benchmark. 5 (1), 1–18.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesKetokivi, M., Choi, T., 2014. Renaissance of case research as a scientific method. J. Oper. Manag. 32 (5), 232–240.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesKiwanuka, A., 2015. Acceptance process: the missing link between UTAUT and diffusion of innovation theory. American Journal of Information Systems 3 (2), 40–44.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesKlathae, V., Ruangchoengchum, P., 2019. The predictable maintenance 4.0 by applying digital technology: a case study of heavy construction machinery. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research 8, 34–46.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesKonecny, P.A., Thun, J.H., 2011. Do it separately or simultaneously—an empirical analysis of a conjoint implementation of TQM and TPM on plant performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 133 (2), 496–507.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesLasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H., Feld, T., Hoffmann, M., 2014. Industry 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering 6 (4), 239–242.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesLee, J., Wang, H., 2008. New Technologies for Maintenance, Complex System Maintenance Handbook. Springer, London.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesLeonard, K., 2004. Critical success factors relating to healthcare’s adoption of new technology: a guide to increasing the likelihood of successful implementation. Electron. Healthc. 2 (4), 72–81.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesLinares Depestre, L. O. (2012). Del Mantenimiento Correctivo al Mantenimiento Centrado en la Confiabilidad. Revista Centro Azúcar, 39(3). Recuperado a partir de http://centroazucar.uclv.edu.cu/index.php/centro_azucar/article/view/341.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesLink, T.C., Reece, B., 2021. Barriers to the adoption of technological innovations in corrections: a review and case study. Int. J. Offender Ther. Comp. Criminol. 65 (2–3), 262–281.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesLlopis-Albert, C., Rubio, F., Valero, F., 2021. Impact of digital transformation on the automotive industry. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 162, 120343.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesLu, Y., 2017. Industry 4.0: a survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration 6, 1–10.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesLundblad, J., 2003. A review and critique of Rogers’ diffusion of innovation theory as it applies to organizations. Organ. Dev. J. 21 (4), 50.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMakse, T., Volden, C., 2011. The role of policy attributes in the diffusion of innovations. J. Polit. 73 (1), 108–124.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMaisiri, W., van Dyk, L., 2021. Industry 4.0 skills: a perspective of the South African manufacturing industry. SA J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 19, 1416.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMarodin, G., Frank, A., Tortorella, G., Saurin, T., 2016. Contextual factors and lean production implementation in the Brazilian automotive supply chain. Supply Chain Manag. 21 (4), 417–432.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMarodin, G., Tortorella, G., Frank, A., Godinho Filho, M., 2017. The moderating effect of Lean supply chain management on the impact of Lean shop floor practices on quality and inventory. Supply Chain Manag.: Int. J. 22 (6), 473–485.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMayring, P., 2004. Qualitative content analysis. A Companion to Qualitative Research 1 (2), 159–176.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMasoni, R., Ferrise, F., Bordegoni, M., Gattullo, M., Uva, A., Fiorentino, M., et al., 2017. Supporting remote maintenance in industry 4.0 through augmented reality. Procedia Manufacturing 11, 1296–1302.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMcKone, K.E., Schroeder, R.G., Cua, K.O., 2001. The impact of total productive maintenance practices on manufacturing performance. J. Oper. Manag. 19 (1), 39–58.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMendez, J., Rodriguez, R., 2017. Total productive maintenance (TPM) as a tool for improving productivity: a case study of application in the bottleneck of an auto-parts machining line. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 92 (1–4), 1013–1026.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMiles, M., Huberman, M., 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: an Expanded Sourcebook. Sage Publishing, Thousand Oaks.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMosyurchak, A., Veselkov, V., Turygin, A., Hammer, M., 2017. Prognosis of behaviour of machine tool spindles, their diagnostics and maintenance. MM Science Journal 2100–2104.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMourtzis, D., Angelopoulos, J., Zogopoulos, V., 2020. Integrated and adaptive AR maintenance and shop-floor rescheduling. Comput. Ind. 103383.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMourtzis, D., Vlachou, E., 2018. A cloud-based cyber-physical system for adaptive shopfloor scheduling and condition-based maintenance. J. Manuf. Syst. 47, 179–198.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesNakajima, S., 1988. Introduction To TPM: Total Productive Maintenance (Translation). Productivity Press, Inc.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesNallusamy, S., Majumdar, G., 2017. Enhancement of overall equipment effectiveness using total productive maintenance in a manufacturing industry. Int. J. Perform. Eng. 13 (2), 173–188.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesNarasimhan, R., 2014. Theory development in operations management: extending the frontiers of a mature discipline via qualitative research. Decis. Sci. J. 45 (2), 209–227.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesNetland, T., 2013. Exploring the phenomenon of company-specific production systems: one-best-way or own-best-way? Int. J. Prod. Res. 51 (4), 1084–1097.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesNetland, T., Ferdows, K., 2014. What to expect from a corporate lean program. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 55 (3), 83–89.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesPagliosa, M., Tortorella, G., Ferreira, J., 2021. Industry 4.0 and Lean Manufacturing: a systematic literature review and future research directions. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 32 (3), 543–569.es_CO
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2es_CO
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1es_CO
Aparece en las colecciones: Ingeniería Mecatrónica

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Morantes_2022_TG.pdfMorantes_2022_TG1,92 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.