• Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Pamplona
  • Trabajos de pregrado y especialización
  • Facultad de Salud
  • Psicología
    • Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://repositoriodspace.unipamplona.edu.co/jspui/handle/20.500.12744/4240
    Registro completo de metadatos
    Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
    dc.contributor.authorAvendaño Escalante, Diego Alejandro.-
    dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T16:55:31Z-
    dc.date.available2019-09-17-
    dc.date.available2022-11-07T16:55:31Z-
    dc.date.issued2019-
    dc.identifier.citationAvendaño Escalante, D.A. (2019). Las dimensiones del autoritarismo y su relación con la orientación política y los axiomas sociales. [Trabajo de Grado Pregrado, Universidad de Pamplona]. Repositorio Hulago Universidad de Pamplona. http://repositoriodspace.unipamplona.edu.co/jspui/handle/20.500.12744/4240es_CO
    dc.identifier.urihttp://repositoriodspace.unipamplona.edu.co/jspui/handle/20.500.12744/4240-
    dc.descriptionEn años recientes, la investigación psicológica sobre autoritarismo ha adoptado una conceptualización multidimensional de este constructo para comprender en mayor detalle su vinculación con otras variables. En el presente estudio correlacional se evaluó una muestra de 1097 participantes de diferentes países hispanohablantes a través de una técnica de muestreo online, con el objetivo de analizar la relación existente entre la orientación política y los axiomas sociales con el autoritarismo y sus tres dimensiones: agresión, sumisión y convencionalismo. En él se encontró que la orientación política de derecha y los axiomas sociales de Religiosidad y Recompensa al Desempeño tuvieron correlaciones positivas con el autoritarismo y se confirmaron como predictores significativos de este último. Asimismo, se discuten los vínculos con cada dimensión del autoritarismo, la naturaleza de la relación con el axioma Control del Destino y la ausencia de asociación con los axiomas Cinismo Social y Complejidad Social.es_CO
    dc.description.abstractIn recent years, psychological research on authoritarianism has adopted a multidimensional conceptualization of this construct in order to understand in greater detail its link with other variables. In the present correlational study, a sample of 1097 participants from different Spanishspeaking countries was evaluated through an online sampling technique, with the aim of analyzing the relationship between political orientation and social axioms with authoritarianism and its three dimensions: aggression, submission and conventionalism. It was found that right-wing political orientation and the social axioms of Religiosity and Reward for Application had positive correlations with authoritarianism and were confirmed as significant predictors of it. Likewise, the links with each authoritarianism dimension, the nature of the relationship with Fate Control and the absence of association with Social Cynicism and Social Complexity are discussed.es_CO
    dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_CO
    dc.language.isoeses_CO
    dc.publisherUniversidad de Pamplona – Facultad de Salud.es_CO
    dc.subjectAutoritarismo.es_CO
    dc.subjectOrientación política.es_CO
    dc.subjectAxiomas sociales.es_CO
    dc.subjectIdeología.es_CO
    dc.subjectCreencias.es_CO
    dc.titleLas dimensiones del autoritarismo y su relación con la orientación política y los axiomas sociales.es_CO
    dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fes_CO
    dc.date.accepted2019-06-17-
    dc.relation.referencesAdorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, R. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York, USA: Harper & Brothers.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesAltemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesAltemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesAltemeyer, B. (1996) The Authoritarian Spectre. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesAltemeyer, B. (2004). The other “authoritarian personality.” In M. P. Zanna (Ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, (Vol. 30, pp. 47-92). San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesAltemeyer, B. (2006). The Authoritarians. Winnipeg, Canada: copyright by Bob Altemeyer.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesAsp, E., Ramchandran, K., & Tranel, D. (2012). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, and the human prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychology, 26(4), 414-421.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesBandura, A. (1977) Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesBond, M., Leung, K., Au, A., Tong, K., & Chemonges‐Nielson, Z. (2004). Combining social axioms with values in predicting social behaviours. European Journal of Personality, 18(3), 177-191.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesBouchard, T., Jr. (2009). Authoritarianism, religiousness, and conservatism: Is “obedience to authority” the explanation for their clustering, universality, and evolution? In E. Voland & W. Schiefenhövel (Eds.), The biological evolution of religious mind and behavior (pp. 165–180). New York: Springer.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesCarney, D., Jost, J., Gosling, S., & Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29(6), 807–840.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesChirumbolo, A., Areni, A., & Sensales, G. (2004). Need for cognitive closure and politics: Voting, political attitudes and attri-butional style. International Journal of Psychology, 39(4), 245–253.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesChristie, R., & Jahoda, M. (Eds.) (1954). Studies in the scope and method of "the authoritarian personality ". Glencoe, IL: Free Press.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesConway, L., & McFarland, J. (2019). Do right-wing and left-wing authoritarianism predict election outcomes?: Support for Obama and Trump across two United States presidential elections. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 84-87.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesDiamond, L. (2004). Elecciones sin democracia. A propósito de los regímenes híbridos. Estudios políticos, (24), 117-134.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesDuckitt, J. (1992). The social psychology of prejudice. New York: Praeger.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesDuckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41-113). San Diego, CA, US: Elsevier Academic Press.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesDuckitt, J. (2010). Right Wing Authoritarianism. In J. M. Levine & M. A. Hogg, (Eds.), Encyclopedia of group processes and intergroup relations, (pp. 706-707). California: SAGE Publications.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesDuckitt, J., & Bizumic, B. (2013). Multidimensionality of right-wing authoritarian attitudes: Authoritarianism-Conservatism-Traditionalism. Political Psychology, 34(6), 841-862.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesDuckitt, J., Bizumic, B., Krauss, S., & Heled, E. (2010). A tripartite approach to right‐wing authoritarianism: The authoritarianism‐conservatism‐traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31(5), 685-715.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesDuckitt, J., & Sibley, C. (2009). A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 20(2-3), 98-109.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesDunwoody, P., & Funke, F. (2016). The Aggression-Submission-Conventionalism Scale: Testing a new three factor measure of authoritarianism. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(2), 571-600.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesEstrada, A., Santamaría, A., Pérez, V., & Romero, V. (2017). Métodos de muestreo para encuestas por correo electrónico y sitios web (encuestas online). Universidad Autónoma de México. Instituto de Investigaciones en Matemáticas Aplicadas y En Sistemas. Recuperado de: https://goo.gl/gtiv5zes_CO
    dc.relation.referencesEtchezahar, E., & Brussino, S. (2015). Dimensiones del autoritarismo, centralidad de la religión y orientaciones religiosas: diferencias en el análisis lineal y no lineal de sus relaciones. Actualidades en Psicología, 29 (118), 73-81.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesEtchezahar, E., & Simkin, H. (2013). Religiosidad, espiritualidad y escepticismo: la mediación del autoritarismo. Subjetividad y Procesos Cognitivos, 17 (2), 48-58.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesFeldman, S. (2003). Enforcing Social Conformity: A Theory of Authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24(1), 41–74.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesFeldman, S., & Johnston, C. (2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology, 35(3), 337-358.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesFricker, R. (2012). Sampling Methods for Web and E-mail Surveys. In N. Fielding, R. M. Lee and G. Blank, (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods, (chapter 11, pp. 195-216). London: SAGE Publications.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesFunke, F. (2005). The dimensionality of right-wing authoritarianism: Lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology, 26, 195–218.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesGaitán, J., & Malagón, M. (2009). Fascismo y autoritarismo en Colombia. Vniversitas, 58(118), 293-316.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesGaleano, J. (2009). Del autoritarismo político al Autoritarismo económico. Umbral Científico, (15), 111-119.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesGamboa, A, Montes, A., & Muñoz, P. (2015). Participación crítica y democrática: Comprensión de los discursos de actores educativos. Zona próxima: revista del Instituto de Estudios Superiores en Educación, (22), 56-68.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesGamboa, A., & Muñoz, P. (2012). Derechos humanos: una mirada desde los imaginarios de la comunidad de práctica de una institución educativa en Cúcuta (Colombia). Magistro, 6(12), 115-123.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesGarcía, E. (2015). Los sistemas políticos e ideologías. En G. Sánchez Medero, y R. Sánchez Medero, (dir). Fundamentos de la Ciencia Política y de la Administración. Madrid: Tecnos.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesGarcía, J. (2012). Latinoamérica: entre la democracia y el autoritarismo. Estudios Políticos, 41, 15-35.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesGormley, B., & Lopez, F. (2010). Authoritarian and Homophobic Attitudes: Gender and Adult Attachment Style Differences. Journal of Homosexuality, 57(4), 525–538.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesHadjar, A., & Boehnke, K. (2017). Authoritarianism. Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.05481-Xes_CO
    dc.relation.referencesHernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2010). Metodología de la investigación, (quinta edición). México: McGraw-Hill.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesJohnson, M., Labouff, J., Rowatt, W., Patock-Peckham, J., & Carlisle, R. (2012). Facets of rightwing authoritarianism mediate the relationship between religious fundamentalism and attitudes toward arabs and african americans. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51(1), 128– 142.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesJohnson, M., Rowatt, W., Barnard-Brak, L., Patock-Peckham, J., LaBouff, J., & Carlisle, R. (2011). A mediational analysis of the role of right-wing authoritarianism and religious fundamentalism in the religiosity–prejudice link. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(6), 851-856.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesJost, J. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651–670.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesJost, J., Banaji, M., & Nosek, B. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesJost, J., Federico, C., & Napier, J. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual review of psychology, 60, 307-337.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesJost, J., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A., & Sulloway, F. (2003). Exceptions that prove the rule—Using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 39–375.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesKeller, H. (1997). Evolutional approaches. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 215–255). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesKemmelmeier, M. (2015). Authoritarianism.. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 262–268. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.25045-9es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesLeak, G., & Randall, B. (1995). Clarification of the link between right-wing authoritarianism and religiousness: The role of religious maturity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34(2), 245-252.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesLeung, K., & Bond, M. (2004). Social Axioms: A Model for Social Beliefs in Multicultural Perspective. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 36, pp. 119-197). San Diego, CA, US: Elsevier Academic Press.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesLeung, K., & Bond, M. (2008). Psycho-logic and eco-logic: Insights from social axiom dimensions, In F. van de Vijver, D. van Hemert, & Y. Poortinga (Eds.), Individuals and cultures in multilevel analysis (pp. 199 − 219). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesLeung, K., & Bond, M. (2013). Social Axioms. In K. Keith (Ed.). The Encyclopedia of CrossCultural Psychology, (pp. 1187–1191). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesLeung, K., Au, A., Huang, X., Kurman, J., Niit, T., & Niit, K. (2007). Social axioms and values: a cross-cultural examination. European Journal of Personality, 21(2), 91–111.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesLeung, K., Bond, M., de Carrasquel, S., Muñoz, C., Hernández, M., Murakami, F., ... & Singelis, T. (2002). Social axioms: The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(3), 286-302.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesLeung, K., Ip, O., & Leung, K. (2010). Social cynicism and job satisfaction: A longitudinal analysis. Applied Psychology, An International Review, 59, 318−338.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesLeung, K., Lam, B., Bond, M., Conway III, L., Gornick, L., Amponsah, B., ... & Busch, H. (2012). Developing and evaluating the social axioms survey in eleven countries: Its relationship with the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(5), 833-857.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesLinz, J. (2010). Obras Escogidas (vol. 3): Regímenes Totalitarios y Autoritarios. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesLudeke, S., Klitgaard, C., & Vitriol, J. (2018). Comprehensively-measured authoritarianism does predict vote choice: The importance of authoritarianism's facets, ideological sorting, and the particular candidate. Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 209-216.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesLuttig, M. (2017). Authoritarianism and affective polarization: A new view on the origins of partisan extremism. Public Opinion Quarterly, 81(4), 866-895.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesMarquez, X. (2015). Authoritarianism. In Gibbons, M., Coole, D., Ellis, E., & Ferguson, K. (Eds). The Encyclopedia of Political Thought (pp. 225-226). New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesMuñoz, P., & Gamboa, A. (2012). Escuela y educación política: una mirada a los imaginarios de actores educativos. Pedagogía y saberes, (36), 135-143.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesNapier, J. L., & Jost, J. T. (2008). The “antidemocratic personality” revisited: A cross‐national investigation of working‐class authoritarianism. Journal of Social Issues, 64(3), 595-617.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesOesterreich, D. (2005). Flight into security: A new approach and measure of the authoritarian personality. Political Psychology, 26(2), 275-298.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesOxley, D., Smith, K., & Alford, J. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321, 1667–1670.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesPino, J. (2017). Entre democracias y autoritarismos: una mirada crítica al estudio de la democracia subnacional en Colombia y Latinoamérica. Colombia Internacional, (91), 215-242.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesProch, J., Elad-Strenger, J., & Kessler, T. (2018). Liberalism and Conservatism, for a Change! Rethinking the Association Between Political Orientation and Relation to Societal Change. Political Psychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12559es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesRadkiewicz, P. (2015). Does authoritarianism imply ethnocentric national attitudes: A revised look at the “authoritarian triad” and right‐wing ideology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 224-236.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesRippl, S., Baier, D., & Boehnke, K. (2007) Europa auf dem Weg nach rechts?. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesRoiser, M., & Willig, C. (2002). The strange death of the authoritarian personality: 50 years of psychological and political debate. History of the Human Sciences, 15(4), 71–96.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesSegal, A. (2014). Totalitarismo, dictadura y autoritarismo: Definiciones y re-definiciones. Revista Gobierno y Gestión Pública, 1(1), 1-37.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesSingelis, T., Hubbard, C., Her, P., & An, S. (2003). Convergent validation of the Social Axioms Survey. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(2), 269-282.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesSinn, J., & Hayes, M. (2018). Is Political Conservatism Adaptive? Reinterpreting Right‐Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation as Evolved, Sociofunctional Strategies. Political Psychology, 39(5), 1123-1139.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesSzmolka, I. (2010). Los regímenes políticos híbridos: democracias y autoritarismos con adjetivos, su conceptualización, categorización y operacionalización dentro de la tipología de regímenes políticos. Revista de Estudios Políticos, (147), 103-135.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesTitus, H., & Hollander, E. (1957). The California F scale in psychological research: 1950-1955. Psychological bulletin, 54(1), 47-64.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesUngaretti, J., & Etchezahar, E. (2016). Visiones del mundo, autoritarismo y dominancia en diferentes expresiones de prejuicio. Acta de Investigación Psicológica - Psychological Research Records, 6(3), 2500-2508.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesVan Hiel, A., Cornelis, I., Roets, A., & De Clercq, B. (2007). A comparison of various authoritarianism scales in Belgian Flanders. European Journal of Personality, 21, 149-168.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesVan Hiel, A., Duriez, B., & Kossowska, M. (2006). The presence of left-wing authoritarianism in Western Europe and its relationship with conservative ideology. Political Psychology, 27(5), 769-793.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesVan Pachterbeke, M., Freyer, C., & Saroglou, V. (2011). When authoritarianism meets religion: Sacrificing others in the name of abstract deontology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(7), 898–903.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesVan Prooijen, J., Krouwel, A., & Pollet, T. (2015). Political Extremism Predicts Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(5), 570–578.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesWilson, M., & Sibley, C. (2013). Social dominance orientation and right‐wing authoritarianism: Additive and interactive effects on political conservatism. Political Psychology, 34(2), 277- 284.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesWink, P., Dillon, M., & Prettyman, A. (2007). Religiousness, spiritual seeking, and authoritarianism: Findings from a longitudinal study. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46(3), 321-335.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesZabel, K., & Christopher, A. (2012). Conservative Ideology. in D. Christie, The Encyclopedia of Peace Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesZapata, J. (2017). Balances y perspectivas. Estudios sobre la prensa en Colombia durante el siglo XIX. Revista mexicana de opinión pública, 23, 83-100.es_CO
    dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2es_CO
    dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1es_CO
    Aparece en las colecciones: Psicología

    Ficheros en este ítem:
    Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
    Avendaño_2019_TG.pdfAvendaño_2019_TG565,36 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
    Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem


    Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.