Revisión sistemática meta - analítica de metodologías de evaluación de actos de habla en niños.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of the study was to identify the most recommendable evaluation method to evaluate speech acts in children from two to fourteen years old. METHODS: A systematic review was made with PICO methodology and statistical analysis of the data obtained by the studies through a metaanalysis. RESULTS: The search for studies yielded two hundred and fifty-four articles of which the ICRAA, the BLOC, the PEP-L, the PREP-R, the Quantitative Conversational Behavior Test (Ccc) of CrockfordLesser and Perkins, the Evaluation of the Pragmatic Component from Oral Data and the Simplified Pragmatic Protocol. ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION: The evaluation methods taken for the study are homogeneous and little variable, which means that it is not possible to establish which is the most recommendable, since there is no difference in applying one or the other, this does not mean that the methods employees are not reliable, since the instruments used obtained positive figures in terms of sensitivity, specificity and validity, to evaluate speech acts in children. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to take into account the type of population and analysis that will be used to propose a protocol, in order to provide more variability to the pragmatic evaluation.