• Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Pamplona
  • Producción Editorial Universidad de Pamplona
  • Revistas
  • Revista Colombiana de Tecnologias de Avanzada (RCTA)
  • Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://repositoriodspace.unipamplona.edu.co/jspui/handle/20.500.12744/10380
    Registro completo de metadatos
    Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
    dc.contributor.authorGómez Cano, Carlos Alberto-
    dc.contributor.authorSánchez Castillo, Verenice-
    dc.contributor.authorJiménez Zapata, Elvia María-
    dc.date.accessioned2025-10-14T22:31:58Z-
    dc.date.available2025-10-14T22:31:58Z-
    dc.date.issued2025-07-01-
    dc.identifier.citationC. A. Gómez Cano, V. Sánchez Castillo, y E. M. Jiménez Zapata, «La innovación asistida por inteligencia artificial en la Educación Superior: un análisis de las principales tendencias y líneas futuras», RCTA, vol. 2, n.º 46, pp. 1–12, jul. 2025. https://doi.org/10.24054/rcta.v2i46.3743es_CO
    dc.identifier.issn1692-7257-
    dc.identifier.issn2500-8625-
    dc.identifier.urihttp://repositoriodspace.unipamplona.edu.co/jspui/handle/20.500.12744/10380-
    dc.descriptionEl estudio analizó las tendencias y desafíos de la innovación educativa asistida por inteligencia artificial en la educación superior global mediante un análisis bibliométrico de 666 documentos de Scopus (2020-2024). Los resultados revelaron un crecimiento exponencial de la producción científica, liderado por China (166 documentos) y EE.UU. (61), con clústeres temáticos dominantes en tecnologías de IA, innovación pedagógica y ética. Sin embargo, se diagnosticó la persistencia de vacíos en cuanto a equidad, interdisciplinariedad y evaluación longitudinal. Además, las colaboraciones internacionales mostraron asimetrías, mientras que las fuentes exploradas señalaron una baja integración de perspectivas críticas y contextos vulnerables. Se concluye que la adopción de la inteligencia en la educación superior requiere marcos éticos sólidos, enfoques inclusivos y políticas que prioricen una innovación abocada a la justicia social.es_CO
    dc.description.abstractThe study analyzed the trends and challenges of AI-assisted educational innovation in global higher education through a bibliometric analysis of 666 Scopus documents (2020-2024). The results revealed exponential growth in scientific production, led by China (166 documents) and the US (61), with dominant thematic clusters in AI technologies, pedagogical innovation, and ethics. However, gaps in equity, interdisciplinarity, and longitudinal assessment were diagnosed. Furthermore, international collaborations showed asymmetries, while the explored sources pointed to a low integration of critical perspectives and vulnerable contexts. It is concluded that adopting intelligence in higher education requires solid ethical frameworks, inclusive approaches, and policies that prioritize innovation focused on social justice.es_CO
    dc.format.extent12es_CO
    dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_CO
    dc.language.isoeses_CO
    dc.publisherAldo Pardo García, Revista Colombiana de Tecnologías de Avanzada, Universidad de Pamplona.es_CO
    dc.relation.ispartofseries1;12-
    dc.subjectinnovación educativaes_CO
    dc.subjectinteligencia artificiales_CO
    dc.subjecteducación superiores_CO
    dc.subjectanálisis bibliométricoes_CO
    dc.subjectequidad educativaes_CO
    dc.titleLa innovación asistida por inteligencia artificial en la Educación Superior: un análisis de las principales tendencias y líneas futurases_CO
    dc.title.alternativeArtificial intelligence-assisted innovation in higher education: an analysis of key trends and future directionses_CO
    dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1es_CO
    dc.description.editionVol. 2 Núm. 46 (2025): Julio – Diciembrees_CO
    dc.relation.referencesM. Akour y M. Alenezi, “Higher Education Future in the Era of Digital Transformation”, Education Sciences, vol. 12, núm. 11, p. 784, nov. 2022, doi: 10.3390/educsci12110784.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesX. O’Dea, “Generative AI: is it a paradigm shift for higher education?”, Studies in Higher Education, vol. 49, núm. 5, pp. 811–816, may 2024, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2024.2332944.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesM. Ali, I. Mustapha, S. Osman, y U. Hassan, “University social responsibility: A review of conceptual evolution and its thematic analysis”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 286, p. 124931, mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124931.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesR. Eslava-Zapata, V. Sánchez-Castillo, y A. J. Pérez-Gamboa, “Responsabilidad social universitaria y la configuración de proyectos de vida: una aproximación de su relación desde las perspectivas de los agentes educativos”, Saber Cienc. Lib., vol. 19, núm. 2, pp. 185–226, jul. 2024, doi: 10.18041/2382-3240/saber.2024v19n2.12010.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesS. Z. Salas-Pilco y Y. Yang, “Artificial intelligence applications in Latin American higher education: a systematic review”, Int J Educ Technol High Educ, vol. 19, núm. 1, p. 21, dic. 2022, doi: 10.1186/s41239-022-00326-w.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesJ. M. Mata Hernández, “Aplicaciones de la inteligencia artificial generativa en la enseñanza del derecho aduanero e internacional”, Reg Cient, vol. 4, núm. 1, p. 2025432, ene. 2025, doi: 10.58763/rc2025432.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesJ. Liu, H. Chang, J. Y.-L. Forrest, y B. Yang, “Influence of artificial intelligence on technological innovation: Evidence from the panel data of china’s manufacturing sectors”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 158, p. 120142, sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120142.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesC. G. Ardito, “Generative AI detection in higher education assessments”, New Drctns for Teach & Learn, p. tl.20624, sep. 2024, doi: 10.1002/tl.20624.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesM. Ashok, R. Madan, A. Joha, y U. Sivarajah, “Ethical framework for Artificial Intelligence and Digital technologies”, International Journal of Information Management, vol. 62, p. 102433, feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102433.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesF. A. Zapata Muriel, S. Montoya Zapata, y D. Montoya-Zapata, “Dilemas éticos planteados por el auge de la inteligencia artificial: una mirada desde el transhumanismo”, Región Científica, vol. 3, núm. 1, p. 2024225, 2024, doi: 10.58763/rc2024225.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesY. Sugitani, T. Togawa, y K. Motoki, “Socially excluded employees prefer algorithmic evaluation to human assessment: The moderating role of an interdependent culture”, Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, vol. 4, p. 100152, may 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100152.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesS. G. Padilla Hernández, “Inteligencia Artificial en los servicios bancarios. Una revisión bibliométrica”, Región Científica, vol. 3, núm. 2, p. 2024335, jul. 2024, doi: 10.58763/rc2024335.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesR. Sajja, Y. Sermet, M. Cikmaz, D. Cwiertny, y I. Demir, “Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Intelligent Assistant for Personalized and Adaptive Learning in Higher Education”, Information, vol. 15, núm. 10, p. 596, sep. 2024, doi: 10.3390/info15100596.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesM. Bond et al., “A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour”, Int J Educ Technol High Educ, vol. 21, núm. 1, p. 4, ene. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesS. Wang, Z. Sun, H. Wang, D. Yang, y H. Zhang, “Enhancing student acceptance of artificial intelligence-driven hybrid learning in business education: Interaction between self-efficacy, playfulness, emotional engagement, and university support”, The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 23, núm. 2, p. 101184, jul. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101184.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesE. Sardiñas Padilla y K. Valdés García, “Incorporación de la inteligencia artificial a la educación cubana. Ventajas y limitaciones”, Reg Cient, vol. 4, núm. 1, p. 2025372, ene. 2025, doi: 10.58763/rc2025372.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesA. Henadirage y N. Gunarathne, “Barriers to and Opportunities for the Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education in the Global South: Insights from Sri Lanka”, Int J Artif Intell Educ, vol. 35, núm. 1, pp. 245–281, mar. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s40593-024-00439-5.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesS. Bulathwela, M. Pérez-Ortiz, C. Holloway, M. Cukurova, y J. Shawe-Taylor, “Artificial Intelligence Alone Will Not Democratise Education: On Educational Inequality, Techno-Solutionism and Inclusive Tools”, Sustainability, vol. 16, núm. 2, p. 781, ene. 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16020781.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesI. Mac Fadden, E.-M. García-Alonso, y E. López Meneses, “Science Mapping of AI as an Educational Tool Exploring Digital Inequalities: A Sociological Perspective”, MTI, vol. 8, núm. 12, p. 106, nov. 2024, doi: 10.3390/mti8120106.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesI. Jiménez-Pitre, G. Molina-Bolívar, y R. Gámez Pitre, “Visión sistémica del contexto educativo tecnológico en Latinoamérica”, Región Científica, vol. 2, núm. 1, p. 202358, 2023, doi: 10.58763/rc202358.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesV. Sánchez-Castillo, A. J. Pérez-Gamboa, y C. A. Gómez-Cano, “Trends and evolution of Scientometric and Bibliometric research in the SCOPUS database”, Bibliotecas, Anales de Investigacion, vol. 20, núm. 1, 2024, [En línea]. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9740327es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesM. I. Adegoriola, J. H. K. Lai, E. H. Chan, y A. Darko, “Heritage building maintenance management (HBMM): A bibliometric-qualitative analysis of literature”, Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 42, p. 102416, oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102416.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesD. Cao y S. Shao, “Towards Complexity and Dynamics: A Bibliometric-Qualitative Review of Network Research in Construction”, Complexity, vol. 2020, pp. 1–19, 2020, doi: 10.1155/2020/8812466.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesV. Sánchez-Castillo, C. A. Gómez-Cano, y A. J. Pérez-Gamboa, “La Economía Azul en el contexto de los objetivos del desarrollo sostenible: una revisión mixta e integrada de la literatura en la base de datos Scopus”, AiBi Revista de Investigación, Administración e Ingeniería, vol. 12, núm. 2, pp. 206–221, 2024, doi: 10.15649/2346030X.4028.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesC. A. Gómez Cano y A. J. Pérez Gamboa, “La adopción de la inteligencia artificial generativa en la Educación Superior: análisis bibliométrico y cienciométrico”, Maestro y Sociedad, vol. 22, núm. 1, pp. 299–311, 2025es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesL. Wang et al., “Artificial Intelligence for COVID-19: A Systematic Review”, Front. Med., vol. 8, p. 704256, sep. 2021, doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.704256.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesA. S. Ahuja, V. P. Reddy, y O. Marques, “Artificial intelligence and COVID-19: A multidisciplinary approach”, Integrative Medicine Research, vol. 9, núm. 3, p. 100434, sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2020.100434.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesA. Deroncele-Acosta, M. L. Palacios-Núñez, y A. Toribio-López, “Digital Transformation and Technological Innovation on Higher Education Post-COVID-19”, Sustainability, vol. 15, núm. 3, p. 2466, ene. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15032466.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesR. O. Okunlaya, N. Syed Abdullah, y R. A. Alias, “Artificial intelligence (AI) library services innovative conceptual framework for the digital transformation of university education”, LHT, vol. 40, núm. 6, pp. 1869–1892, dic. 2022, doi: 10.1108/LHT-07-2021-0242.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesF.-V. Pantelimon, R. Bologa, A. Toma, y B.-S. Posedaru, “The Evolution of AI-Driven Educational Systems during the COVID-19 Pandemic”, Sustainability, vol. 13, núm. 23, p. 13501, dic. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su132313501.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesM. A. Ayanwale y M. Ndlovu, “Investigating factors of students’ behavioral intentions to adopt chatbot technologies in higher education: Perspective from expanded diffusion theory of innovation”, Computers in Human Behavior Reports, vol. 14, p. 100396, may 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100396.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesM. Neumann, M. Rauschenberger, y E.-M. Schön, “‘We Need To Talk About ChatGPT’: The Future of AI and Higher Education”, en 2023 IEEE/ACM 5th International Workshop on Software Engineering Education for the Next Generation (SEENG), Melbourne, Australia: IEEE, may 2023, pp. 29–32. doi: 10.1109/SEENG59157.2023.00010.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesA. Gudigar et al., “Role of Artificial Intelligence in COVID-19 Detection”, Sensors, vol. 21, núm. 23, p. 8045, dic. 2021, doi: 10.3390/s21238045.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesA. M. Chaves Cano y A. J. Pérez Gamboa, “Artificial intelligence in strengthening health services: a critical analysis of the literatura”, Health Leadership and Quality of Life, vol. 3, dic. 2024, doi: 10.56294/hl2024.422.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesK. Hua Hu, “An exploration of the key determinants for the application of AI-enabled higher education based on a hybrid Soft-computing technique and a DEMATEL approach”, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 212, p. 118762, feb. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118762.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesH. Crompton y D. Burke, “Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field”, Int J Educ Technol High Educ, vol. 20, núm. 1, p. 22, abr. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesJ. Delcker, J. Heil, D. Ifenthaler, S. Seufert, y L. Spirgi, “First-year students AI-competence as a predictor for intended and de facto use of AI-tools for supporting learning processes in higher education”, Int J Educ Technol High Educ, vol. 21, núm. 1, p. 18, mar. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s41239-024-00452-7.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesV. González-Calatayud, P. Prendes-Espinosa, y R. Roig-Vila, “Artificial Intelligence for Student Assessment: A Systematic Review”, Applied Sciences, vol. 11, núm. 12, p. 5467, jun. 2021, doi: 10.3390/app11125467.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesK. Stecuła y R. Wolniak, “Influence of COVID-19 Pandemic on Dissemination of Innovative E-Learning Tools in Higher Education in Poland”, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 8, núm. 2, p. 89, jun. 2022, doi: 10.3390/joitmc8020089.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesR. Michel-Villarreal, E. Vilalta-Perdomo, D. E. Salinas-Navarro, R. Thierry-Aguilera, y F. S. Gerardou, “Challenges and Opportunities of Generative AI for Higher Education as Explained by ChatGPT”, Education Sciences, vol. 13, núm. 9, p. 856, ago. 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13090856.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesJ. Southworth et al., “Developing a model for AI Across the curriculum: Transforming the higher education landscape via innovation in AI literacy”, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, p. 100127, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100127.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesF. Wu et al., “Towards a new generation of artificial intelligence in China”, Nat Mach Intell, vol. 2, núm. 6, pp. 312–316, jun. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s42256-020-0183-4.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesM. Tu, S. Dall’erba, y M. Ye, “Spatial and Temporal Evolution of the Chinese Artificial Intelligence Innovation Network”, Sustainability, vol. 14, núm. 9, p. 5448, abr. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14095448.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesM. Hernandez-de-Menendez, C. Escobar Díaz, y R. Morales-Menendez, “Technologies for the future of learning: state of the art”, Int J Interact Des Manuf, vol. 14, núm. 2, pp. 683–695, jun. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s12008-019-00640-0.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesF. J. Cantú-Ortiz, N. Galeano Sánchez, L. Garrido, H. Terashima-Marin, y R. F. Brena, “An artificial intelligence educational strategy for the digital transformation”, Int J Interact Des Manuf, vol. 14, núm. 4, pp. 1195–1209, dic. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s12008-020-00702-8.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesJ.-M. Romero-Rodríguez, M.-S. Ramírez-Montoya, M. Buenestado-Fernández, y F. Lara-Lara, “Use of ChatGPT at University as a Tool for Complex Thinking: Students’ Perceived Usefulness”, J. New Approaches Educ. Res., vol. 12, núm. 2, pp. 323–339, jul. 2023, doi: 10.7821/naer.2023.7.1458.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesA. Amjad, P. Kordel, y G. Fernandes, “A Review on Innovation in Healthcare Sector (Telehealth) through Artificial Intelligence”, Sustainability, vol. 15, núm. 8, p. 6655, abr. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15086655.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesA. Bhutoria, “Personalized education and Artificial Intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a Human-In-The-Loop model”, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, p. 100068, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesE. Hine y L. Floridi, “Artificial intelligence with American values and Chinese characteristics: a comparative analysis of American and Chinese governmental AI policies”, AI & Soc, vol. 39, núm. 1, pp. 257–278, feb. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s00146-022-01499-8.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesJ. E. Perez Perez, “The application of Gen-AI and creativity in the context of public education in frontier environments”, JET, vol. 18, núm. 4, pp. 223–231, nov. 2024, doi: 10.1108/JET-05-2024-0030.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesJ. C. Vázquez-Parra, C. Henao-Rodríguez, J. P. Lis-Gutiérrez, y S. Palomino-Gámez, “Importance of University Students’ Perception of Adoption and Training in Artificial Intelligence Tools”, Societies, vol. 14, núm. 8, p. 141, ago. 2024, doi: 10.3390/soc14080141.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesL. Espina-Romero, D. Ríos Parra, J. G. Noroño-Sánchez, G. Rojas-Cangahuala, L. E. Cervera Cajo, y P. A. Velásquez-Tapullima, “Navigating Digital Transformation: Current Trends in Digital Competencies for Open Innovation in Organizations”, Sustainability, vol. 16, núm. 5, p. 2119, mar. 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16052119.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesL. Guo, D. Wang, F. Gu, Y. Li, Y. Wang, y R. Zhou, “Evolution and trends in intelligent tutoring systems research: a multidisciplinary and scientometric view”, Asia Pacific Educ. Rev., vol. 22, núm. 3, pp. 441–461, sep. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12564-021-09697-7.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesM. Wei, “The Design of Intelligent Tutoring Systems Using College Students’ Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education under the Background of Online Teaching”, Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 2022, pp. 1–9, abr. 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/9180933.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesC. Fachola, A. Tornaría, P. Bermolen, G. Capdehourat, L. Etcheverry, y M. I. Fariello, “Federated Learning for Data Analytics in Education”, Data, vol. 8, núm. 2, p. 43, feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/data8020043.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesS. Banabilah, M. Aloqaily, E. Alsayed, N. Malik, y Y. Jararweh, “Federated learning review: Fundamentals, enabling technologies, and future applications”, Information Processing & Management, vol. 59, núm. 6, p. 103061, nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103061.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesY. Dai, A. Liu, y C. P. Lim, “Reconceptualizing ChatGPT and generative AI as a student-driven innovation in higher education”, Procedia CIRP, vol. 119, pp. 84–90, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2023.05.002.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesY. Jin, L. Yan, V. Echeverria, D. Gašević, y R. Martinez-Maldonado, “Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines”, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 8, p. 100348, jun. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100348.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesT. K. F. Chiu, “Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI”, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 6, p. 100197, jun. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100197.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesF. D. Camastra y R. González Vallejo, “Inteligencia artificial, sostenibilidad e impacto ambiental. Un estudio narrativo y bibliométrico”, Región Científica, vol. 4, núm. 1, p. 2025355, ene. 2025, doi: 10.58763/rc2025355.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesJ. Batista, A. Mesquita, y G. Carnaz, “Generative AI and Higher Education: Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions from a Systematic Literature Review”, Information, vol. 15, núm. 11, p. 676, oct. 2024, doi: 10.3390/info15110676.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesN. J. Francis, S. Jones, y D. P. Smith, “Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and Integrity”, Br J Biomed Sci, vol. 81, p. 14048, ene. 2025, doi: 10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesW. Leal Filho et al., “Using artificial intelligence to implement the UN sustainable development goals at higher education institutions”, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, vol. 31, núm. 6, pp. 726–745, ago. 2024, doi: 10.1080/13504509.2024.2327584.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesR. S. Baker y A. Hawn, “Algorithmic Bias in Education”, Int J Artif Intell Educ, vol. 32, núm. 4, pp. 1052–1092, dic. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesF. Filgueiras, “Artificial intelligence and education governance”, Education, Citizenship and Social, vol. 19, núm. 3, pp. 349–361, nov. 2024, doi: 10.1177/17461979231160674.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesM. Sarián González, C. Bruna Román, C. Robles Lagos, y G. Vaca Lombana, “Gestión empresarial de la sostenibilidad, RSE e Inteligencia Artificial. Una nueva frontera en las decisiones”, Región Científica, vol. 4, núm. 1, p. 2025382, 2025, doi: 10.58763/rc2025382.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesB. Memarian y T. Doleck, “Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics (FATE) in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and higher education: A systematic review”, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5, p. 100152, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100152.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesA. M. Al-Abdullatif, “Modeling Teachers’ Acceptance of Generative Artificial Intelligence Use in Higher Education: The Role of AI Literacy, Intelligent TPACK, and Perceived Trust”, Education Sciences, vol. 14, núm. 11, p. 1209, nov. 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14111209.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesC. McGrath, T. Cerratto Pargman, N. Juth, y P. J. Palmgren, “University teachers’ perceptions of responsibility and artificial intelligence in higher education - An experimental philosophical study”, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, p. 100139, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100139.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesS. Z. Salas-Pilco, K. Xiao, y X. Hu, “Artificial Intelligence and Learning Analytics in Teacher Education: A Systematic Review.”, Education Sciences, vol. 13, núm. 9, p. 897, sep. 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13090897.es_CO
    dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2es_CO
    dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1es_CO
    Aparece en las colecciones: Revista Colombiana de Tecnologias de Avanzada (RCTA)

    Ficheros en este ítem:
    Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
    Art01_V2_N46_2025_esp.pdfArt01_V2_N46_2025_esp606,12 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


    Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.