• Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Pamplona
  • Trabajos de pregrado y especialización
  • Facultad de Salud
  • Fonoaudiología
    • Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://repositoriodspace.unipamplona.edu.co/jspui/handle/20.500.12744/4990
    Registro completo de metadatos
    Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
    dc.contributor.authorTolosa López, Silvia Juliana.-
    dc.date.accessioned2022-12-01T17:46:49Z-
    dc.date.available2020-09-05-
    dc.date.available2022-12-01T17:46:49Z-
    dc.date.issued2020-
    dc.identifier.citationTolosa López, S.J. (2020). Efectividad de los métodos de evaluación fonético acústico para el diagnóstico de la disfonía en adultos y adultos mayores. [Trabajo de Grado Pregrado, Universidad de Pamplona]. Repositorio Hulago Universidad de Pamplona. http://repositoriodspace.unipamplona.edu.co/jspui/handle/20.500.12744/4990es_CO
    dc.identifier.urihttp://repositoriodspace.unipamplona.edu.co/jspui/handle/20.500.12744/4990-
    dc.descriptionINTRODUCCIÓN: La disfonía es un trastorno de la voz que ocurre cuando la calidad, el tono y el volumen de esta difieren, su evaluación puede ser subjetiva y objetiva, destacando dentro de los procedimientos objetivos, dos métodos recientemente desarrollados para cuantificar la gravedad de la disfonía, la medida de prominencia cepstral suavizada (CPPS) y el índice de calidad de la voz acústica (AVQI); el objetivo de este estudio consiste en determinar la precisión diagnostica del (AVQI) en relación a la (CPPS) en la evaluación de la voz sostenida y continua MÉTODOS: se realizó una revisión sistemática metanalitica mediante una búsqueda de literatura y análisis estadístico de la información hallada RESULTADOS: la prueba (AVQI) demuestra ser más específica pero menos sensible que la prueba de referencia estándar. El (AVQI) tiene mayor capacidad diagnostica con valores de Odds Ratio de 42,55 en relación a 22,74 de la prueba (CPPS) ANÁLISIS Y DISCUSIÓN: la heterogeneidad de la evidencia encontrada y precisión diagnostica de las pruebas objeto de estudio, permite determinar que la AVQI es más heterogénea que la (CPSS), sin embargo es más precisa en la evaluación y diagnóstico de la voz CONCLUSIONES: El (AVQI) mostró ser la medida acústica más robusta para la evaluación y el diagnóstico de la severidad de la disfonía; puesto que, abarca seis marcadores acústicos que miden a nivel global la calidad de la voz sostenida y continua.es_CO
    dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Dysphonia is a voice disorder that occurs when the quality, tone and volume of this difference, its evaluation can be subjective and objective, highlighting within the objective procedures, two recently developed methods to quantify the severity of the dysphonia, the smoothed cepstral prominence measure (CPPS) and the acoustic voice quality index (AVQI); the objective of this study is to determine the diagnostic precision (AVQI) in relation to the (CPPS) in the evaluation of the sustained and continuous voice METHODS: a systematic systematic review was performed through a literature search and statistical analysis of the information RESULTS: found the test (AVQI) proves to be more specific but less sensitive than the standard reference test. The (AVQI) has greater diagnostic capacity with Odds Ratio values of 42.55 in relation to 22.74 of the test (CPPS). ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION: the heterogeneity of the evidence found and the diagnostic precision of the tests under study, allows determine that the AVQI is more heterogeneous than the (CPSS), however it is more precise in the evaluation and diagnosis of the voice CONCLUSIONS: The (AVQI) demonstrated the most robust acoustic measure for the evaluation and diagnosis of the severity of dysphonia since it encompasses six acoustic markers that globally measure sustained and continuous voice quality.es_CO
    dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_CO
    dc.language.isoeses_CO
    dc.publisherUniversidad de Pamplona – Facultad de Salud.es_CO
    dc.subjectAdulto.es_CO
    dc.subjectSensibilidad.es_CO
    dc.subjectAcústica.es_CO
    dc.subjectVoz.es_CO
    dc.subjectDisfonía.es_CO
    dc.subjectEspecificidad.es_CO
    dc.titleEfectividad de los métodos de evaluación fonético acústico para el diagnóstico de la disfonía en adultos y adultos mayores.es_CO
    dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fes_CO
    dc.date.accepted2020-06-05-
    dc.relation.referencesLara Peinado A, Sistiaga Surez JA. Patología de la voz. Med - Programa Form M?dica Contin Acreditado [Internet]. 2007 Nov [cited 2019 Jul 11];9(91):5876–84. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0211344907747495es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesMahalingam S, Boominathan P, Arunachalam R, Venkatesh L, Srinivas S. Cepstral Measures to Analyze Vocal Fatigue in Individuals With Hyperfunctional Voice Disorder. J Voice. 2020 Mar 14;es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesHernández-Jaramillo J, Cruz-Velandia I, Torres-Narváez M. INVESTIGACIÓN CLÍNICA EN FONOAUDIOLOGÍA: ANÁLISIS DE LA LITERATURA CIENTÍFICA. Vol. 58, Investigación clínica en Fonoaudiología Hernández J y cols. Rev.Fac.Med. 2010.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesLopes LW, da Silva JD, Simões LB, Evangelista D da S, Silva POC, Almeida AA, et al. Relationship Between Acoustic Measurements and Self-evaluation in Patients With Voice Disorders. J Voice. 2017 Jan 1;31(1):119.e1-119.e10.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesZiwei Y, Zheng P, Pin D. Multiparameter voice assessment for voice disorder patients: A correlation analysis between objective and subjective parameters. J Voice. 2014 Nov 1;28(6):770–4.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesBarsties v. Latoszek B, Lehnert B, Janotte B. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in German. J Voice. 2020 Jan 1;34(1):157.e17-157.e25.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesConstanza M, Otálora S, Molina Béjar R, Matus NC, Dotor LD, Torres LN. PERFIL Y COMPETENCIAS PROFESIONALES DEL FONOAUDIÓLOGO EN COLOMBIA EQUIPO DE TRABAJO. 2014es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesEL CONGRESO DE COLOMBIA. LEY 376 DE 1997 [Internet]. Por la cual se reglamenta la profesión de Fonoaudiología y se dictan normas para su ejercicio en Colombia. . 1997 [cited 2020 Apr 28]. p. 1–3. Available from: https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/articles-105005_archivo_pdf.pdfes_CO
    dc.relation.referencesMadill C, Nguyen DD, Eastwood C, Heard R, Warhurst S. Comparison of Cepstral Peak Prominence Measures Using the ADSV, SpeechTool, and VoiceSauce Acoustic Analysis Programs in Vocally Healthy Female Speakers. Acoust Aust. 2018 Aug 1;46(2):215–26.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesBrockmann-Bauser M, Van Stan JH, Carvalho Sampaio M, Bohlender JE, Hillman RE, Mehta DD. Effects of Vocal Intensity and Fundamental Frequency on Cepstral Peak Prominence in Patients with Voice Disorders and Vocally Healthy Controls. J Voice. 2019 Dec 17;es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesUloza V, Petrauskas T, Padervinskis E, Ulozaitė N, Barsties B, Maryn Y. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language. J Voice. 2017 Mar 1;31(2):257.e1-257.e11.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesLee JM, Roy N, Peterson E, Merrill RM. Comparison of Two Multiparameter Acoustic Indices of Dysphonia Severity: The Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia. J Voice. 2018 Jul 1;32(4):515.e1-515.e13es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesBarsties B, De Bodt M. Assessment of voice quality: Current state-of-the-art. Auris Nasus Larynx [Internet]. 2015 Jun [cited 2018 Dec 2];42(3):183–8. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0385814614002053es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesGarcia-Alamino JM, Lopez-Cano M. Systematic reviews with meta-analysis of clinical trials: Is there enough evidence? Cir Esp. 2020 Jan 1;98(1):4–8.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesGarzón Segura, Anni Marcela; Penagos López LA. DISPONIBILIDAD LÉXICA EN ESTUDIANTES DE PRIMER SEMESTRE DE PREGRADO DE UNA INSTITUCIÓN UNIVERSITARIA DE VILLAVICENCIO, COLOMBIA. Red Rev Científicas América Lat el Caribe, España y Port. 2016;29(0120-338X):63–84.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesFerreira González I, Urrútia G, Alonso-Coello P. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Scientific rationale and interpretation. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011 Aug 1;64(8):688–96.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesQuirino EMB, Pinho CM, Silva MAS, Dourado CARO, Lima MCL de, Andrade MS. Perfil epidemiológico e clínico de casos de microcefalia. Enfermería Glob. 2019 Dec 20;19(1):167–208.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesCiapponi A. QUADAS-2: instrumento para la evaluación de la calidad de estudios de precisión diagnóstica QUADAS-2: an instrument for the evaluation of the quality of diagnostic precision studies [Internet]. [cited 2020 Apr 26]. Available from: http://www.bris.ac.uk/quadases_CO
    dc.relation.referencesYanji Q, Zhirong Y, Feng S, Siyan Z. Risk on bias assessment: (6) a revised tool for the quality assessment on diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2). Chinese J Endem. 2018 Apr 1;39(4):524–31.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesAguayo-Albasini JL, Flores-Pastor B, Soria-Aledo V. Sistema GRADE: Clasificación de la calidad de la evidencia y graduación de la fuerza de la recomendación. Cir Esp. 2014 Feb 1;92(2):82–8.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesCarmona G, Bonilla C, Huamán K, Reye N, Hijar G, Caballero P. Use of deliberative dialogues for the formulation of recommendations for clinical practice guidelines. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2017 Oct 1;34(4):738–43.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesTaveira KVM, Santos RS, Leão BLC de, Stechman Neto J, Pernambuco L, Silva LK da, et al. Diagnostic validity of methods for assessment of swallowing sounds: a systematic review. Vol. 84, Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. Elsevier Editora Ltda; 2018. p. 638–52.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesRocío Del Valle Benavides A, Manuel J, Pichardo M. Curvas ROC (Receiver-Operating-Characteristic) y sus aplicaciones.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesMolina Arias Ma. Aspectos metodológicos del metaanálisis . Rev Pediatr Aten Primaria [Internet]. 2018 Oct [cited 2020 May 19];1–6. Available from: http://archivos.pap.es/Empty/PAP/front/Articulos/Imprimir/_OrCjUxDG4croFblaIuWJH2fF0HqiaKTEU8xQBE28BbIes_CO
    dc.relation.referencesSauder C, Bretl M, Eadie T. Predicting Voice Disorder Status From Smoothed Measures of Cepstral Peak Prominence Using Praat and Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice (ADSV). J Voice. 2017 Sep 1;31(5):557–66.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesHeman-Ackah YD, Sataloff RT, Laureyns G, Lurie D, Michael DD, Heuer R, et al. Quantifying the cepstral peak prominence, a measure of dysphonia. J Voice. 2014 Nov 1;28(6):783–8.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesAwan SN, Awan JA. A Two-Stage Cepstral Analysis Procedure for the Classification of Rough Voices. J Voice. 2020 Jan 1;34(1):9–19.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesKim GH, Bae IH, Park HJ, Lee YW. Comparison of Cepstral Analysis Based on Voiced-Segment Extraction and Voice Tasks for Discriminating Dysphonic and Normophonic Korean Speakers. J Voice. 2019;0(0).es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesDelgado-Hernández J, León-Gómez N, Jiménez-álvarez A. Diagnostic accuracy of the Smoothed Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPPS) in the detection of dysphonia in the Spanish language. Loquens. 2019;6(1).es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesNúñez-Batalla F, Cartón-Corona N, Vasile G, García-Cabo P, Fernández-Vañes L, Llorente-Pendás JL. Validation of the measures of cepstral peak prominence as a measure of dysphonia severity in Spanish-speaking subjects. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2019 Jul 1;70(4):222–8.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesKitayama I, Hosokawa K, Iwahashi T, Iwahashi M, Iwaki S, Kato C, et al. Intertext Variability of Smoothed Cepstral Peak Prominence, Methods to Control It, and Its Diagnostic Properties. J Voice. 2018 May 1;34(3):305–19es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesKishore Pebbili G, Shabnam S, Pushpavathi M, Rashmi J, Gopi Sankar R, Nethra R, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.03 in Discriminating across the Perceptual Degrees of Dysphonia Severity in Kannada Language. J Voice. 2019 Sep 19;es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesHosokawa K, Barsties B, Iwahashi T, Iwahashi M, Kato C, Iwaki S, et al. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language. J Voice. 2017 Mar 1;31(2):260.e1-260.e9.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesKim GH, Lee YW, Bae IH, Park HJ, Wang SG, Kwon SB. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Korean Language. J Voice. 2019 Nov 1;33(6):948.e1-948.e9.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesEnglert M, Barsties v. Latoszek B, Maryn Y, Behlau M. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, to the Brazilian Portuguese Language. J Voice. 2019;es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesKankare E, Barsties V. Latoszek B, Maryn Y, Asikainen M, Rorarius E, Vilpas S, et al. The acoustic voice quality index version 02.02 in the Finnish-speaking population. Logop Phoniatr Vocology. 2019;es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesCrespo N, Rivera E, Figueroa F, Chacón K, López L, Gonzalez S. MÉTODOS DE EVALUACIÓN DE LA VOZ EN DOCENTES UNA REVISIÓN SISTEMÁTICA. Rev CIENTÍFICA SIGNOS FÓNICOS [Internet]. 2018 Jun 7 [cited 2019 Aug 2];3(1). Available from: http://revistas.unipamplona.edu.co/ojs_viceinves/index.php/CDH/article/view/2875es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesCrestani S, Woisard V. Exploración de la laringe. EMC - Otorrinolaringol. 2014 Apr 1;43(2):1–14es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesBalasubramanium RK, Karuppali S, Bajaj G, Shastry A, Bhat J. Acoustic-Perceptual Correlates of Voice in Indian Hindu Purohits. J Voice. 2019 Sep 1;33(5):804.e1-804.e4.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesde Almeida SC, Mendes AP, Kempster GB. The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Psychometric Characteristics: II European Portuguese Version (II EP CAPE-V). J Voice. 2019 Jul 1;33(4):582.e5- 582.e13.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesVaz Freitas S, Pestana PM, Almeida V, Ferreira A. Audio-perceptual evaluation of portuguese voice disorders - An inter- and intrajudge reliability study. J Voice. 2014 Mar 1;28(2):210–5.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesIwarsson J, Bingen-Jakobsen A, Johansen DS, Kølle IE, Pedersen SG, Thorsen SL, et al. Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Dysphonia: A Comparison Between Narrow and Broad Terminology Systems. J Voice. 2018 Jul 1;32(4):428–36.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesSkowronski MD, Shrivastav R, Hunter EJ. Cepstral Peak Sensitivity: A Theoretic Analysis and Comparison of Several Implementations. J Voice. 2015 Nov 1;29(6):670–81.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesBatthyany C, Maryn Y, Trauwaen I, Caelenberghe E, van Dinther J, Zarowski A, et al. A case of specificity: How does the acoustic voice quality index perform in normophonic subjects? Appl Sci. 2019 Jun 1;9(12).es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesBarsties B, Maryn Y. The improvement of internal consistency of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index. Am J Otolaryngol - Head Neck Med Surg. 2015 Sep 1;36(5):647–56.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesDíaz AD BCCS. ¿Son suficientes los indicadores del rendimiento de una prueba o test diagnóstico para evaluar su desempeño? Rev Cuba Med Gen Integr [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 May 23];3(34):94–109. Available from: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=89064es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesMaryn Y, Weenink D. Objective dysphonia measures in the program praat: Smoothed cepstral peak prominence and acoustic voice quality index. J Voice. 2015 Jan 1;29(1):35–43es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesReghunathan S, Bryson PC. Components of Voice Evaluation. Vol. 52, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. W.B. Saunders; 2019. p. 589–95.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesWatts CR, Awan SN, Maryn Y. A Comparison of Cepstral Peak Prominence Measures From Two Acoustic Analysis Programs. J Voice. 2017 May 1;31(3):387.e1-387.e10.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesNúñez-Batalla F, Díaz-Fresno E, Álvarez-Fernández A, Muñoz Cordero G, Llorente Pendás JL. Aplicación del índice S. Tolosa López, M. Mogollón Tolosa acústico de calidad vocal para la cuantificación objetiva de la severidad de la disfonía. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2017 Jul 1;68(4):204–11.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesGaskill CS, Awan JA, Watts CR, Awan SN. Acoustic and Perceptual Classification of Within-sample Normal, Intermittently Dysphonic, and Consistently Dysphonic Voice Types. J Voice. 2017 Mar 1;31(2):218–28es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesHasanvand A, Salehi A, Ebrahimipour M. A Cepstral Analysis of Normal and Pathologic Voice Qualities in Iranian Adults: A Comparative Study. J Voice. 2017 Jul 1;31(4):508.e17-508.e23.es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesFaham M, Laukkanen AM, Ikävalko T, Rantala L, Geneid A, Holmqvist-Jämsén S, et al. Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a Potential Tool for Voice Screening. J Voice. 2019 Sep 30;es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesFaham M, Laukkanen AM, Ikävalko T, Rantala L, Geneid A, Holmqvist-Jämsén S, et al. Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a Potential Tool for Voice Screening. J Voice. 2019;es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesPommée T, Maryn Y, Finck C, Morsomme D. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French. J Voice. 2018 Dec 28;es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesKishore Pebbili G, Shabnam S, Pushpavathi M, Rashmi J, Gopi Sankar R, Nethra R, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.03 in Discriminating across the Perceptual Degrees of Dysphonia Severity in Kannada Language. J Voice. 2019;es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesTeixeira JP, Gonçalves A. Accuracy of Jitter and Shimmer Measurements. Procedia Technol [Internet]. 2014 Jan 1 [cited 2018 Dec 1];16:1190–9. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212017314003612es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesNúñez Batalla F, González Márquez R, Peláez González MB, González Laborda I, Fernández Fernández M, Morato Galán M. Análisis acústico de la voz mediante el progama Praat: estudio comparativo con el programa Dr. Speech. Acta Otorrinolaringológica Española [Internet]. 2014 May 1 [cited 2018 Dec 1];65(3):170–6. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001651914000247?via%3Dihubes_CO
    dc.relation.referencesJonathan Delgado Hernández NMLGAJRLIA. Análisis acústico de la voz: medidas temporales, espectrales y cepstrales en la voz normal con el Praat en una muestra de hablantes de español - Dialnet. 2017 [cited 2019 Nov 29];108–27. Available from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6235178es_CO
    dc.relation.referencesHiggins JPT GS. Manual Cochrane de revisiones sistemáticas de intervenciones [Internet]. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 . 2011 [cited 2020 May 21]. p. 1–639. Available from: https://es.cochrane.org/sites/es.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/manual_cochrane_510_web.pdfes_CO
    dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2es_CO
    dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1es_CO
    Aparece en las colecciones: Fonoaudiología

    Ficheros en este ítem:
    Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
    Tolosa_2020_TG.pdfTolosa_2020_TG1,47 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
    Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem


    Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.