Escudo Universidad de Pamplona

Repositorio Institucional

Universidad de Pamplona

Preservamos, organizamos y difundimos la producción académica, científica, investigativa y cultural de la Universidad de Pamplona, garantizando el acceso abierto al conocimiento generado por nuestra comunidad universitaria.

Explorar colecciones

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://repositoriodspace.unipamplona.edu.co/jspui/handle/20.500.12744/4911
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorEsteban Villamizar, Luis Alberto.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-30T16:01:57Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-11-
dc.date.available2022-11-30T16:01:57Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationEsteban Villamizar, L. A. (2020). Modelo de despliegue de procesos de software en ambientes colaborativos y distribuidos típicos del desarrollo de Software Libre [Trabajo de Grado Maestría, Universidad de Pamplona]. Repositorio Hulago Universidad de Pamplona. http://repositoriodspace.unipamplona.edu.co/jspui/handle/20.500.12744/4911es_CO
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositoriodspace.unipamplona.edu.co/jspui/handle/20.500.12744/4911-
dc.descriptionEste trabajo define un modelo de despliegue de procesos adaptado a las necesidades de una comunidad de desarrollo de software libre y open source (Free/Libre and Open Source Software FLOSS), en la cual los miembros est´an distribuidos geogr´aficamente y trabajan de manera colaborativa sin un contrato de compromisos para con el proyecto. Este modelo fue validado mediante juicio de expertos. Un Modelo de este tipo permite mejorar la interacci´on en una comunidad que desarrolla software, lo que podr´ıa llevar a la obtenci´on de procesos mas usables para quienes por primera vez se vinculan a una comunidad de desarrollo FLOSS, teniendo claro su rol desde el principio y el proceso asignado a cada rol.es_CO
dc.description.abstractEl autor no proporciona la información sobre este ítem.es_CO
dc.format.extent117es_CO
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.language.isoeses_CO
dc.publisherUniversidad de Pamplona – Facultad de Ingenierías y Arquitectura.es_CO
dc.subjectEl autor no proporciona la información sobre este ítem.es_CO
dc.titleModelo de despliegue de procesos de software en ambientes colaborativos y distribuidos típicos del desarrollo de Software Libre.es_CO
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcces_CO
dc.date.accepted2020-05-11-
dc.relation.referencesAcuña, S., Castro, J., Dieste, O., and Juristo, N. (2012). A systematic mapping study on the open source software development process. In IET Seminar Digest, volume 2012, pages 42–46. 53es_CO
dc.relation.referencesAcuña, S. T., S, A. B., Estero, S., and Ferr´e, X. (2000). Software Process Modelling. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 237–242. 47es_CO
dc.relation.referencesAgile Manifesto (2001). Principios del Manifiesto Agil. ´ 27, 44es_CO
dc.relation.referencesAgrawal, K., Amreen, S., and Mockus, A. (2015). Commit quality in five high performance computing projects. In Proceedings - 2015 International Workshop on Software Engineering for High Performance Computing in Science, SE4HPCS 2015, pages 24–29. 50es_CO
dc.relation.referencesAksulu, A. and Wade, M. (2013). A multivariate classification of open source developers. Information Sciences, 221:72–83. 50es_CO
dc.relation.referencesAl-Marzouq, M., Zheng, L., Rong, G., and Grover, V. (2005). Open Source: Concepts, Benefits, and Challenges. CAIS, 16:37. 54es_CO
dc.relation.referencesAlMarzouq, M., Grover, V., and Thatcher, J. B. (2015). Taxing the development structure of open source communities: An information processing view. Decision Support Systems, 80:27–41.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesAlshaikh, Z., Mostafa, S., Wang, X., and He, S. (2015). A empirical study on the status of software localization in open source projects. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE, volume 2015-Janua, pages 692–695.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesAlshakhouri, M., Buchan, J., and MacDonell, S. G. (2018). Synchronised visualisation of software process and product artefacts: Concept, design and prototype implementation. Information and Software Technology, 98:131–145.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesAlvertis, I., Koussouris, S., Papaspyros, D., Arvanitakis, E., Mouzakitis, S., Franken, S., Kolvenbach, S., and Prinz, W. (2016). User Involvement in Software Development Processes. Procedia Computer Science, 97:73–83.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesAlves, D. and De Souza Matos, E. (2017). Interaction design in free/libre/open source software development: A systematic mapping. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesSillitti, A. and Succi, G. (2005). Agilidad y desarrollo de Software Libre. Novatica, 175.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesSojer, M. and Henkel, J. (2010). Code reuse in open source software development: Quantitative evidence, drivers, and impediments. Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 11(12):868–901.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesSpinellis, D., Gousios, G., Karakoidas, V., Louridas, P., Adams, P. J., Samoladas, I., and Stamelos, I. (2009). Evaluating the Quality of Open Source Software. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 233(C):5–28.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesStallman, R. M., Behlendorf, B., Bradner, S., Hamerly, J., Mckusick, K., Tim, O., Paquin, T., Perens, B., Raymond, E., Stallman, R., Tiemann, M., and Others (1999). Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesTeam, C. P. (2002a). CMMI for Software Engineering, Version 1.1, Continuous Representation (CMMI-SW, V1.1, Continuous). Technical Report CMU/SEI-2002-TR-028, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesTeam, C. P. (2002b). CMMI for Software Engineering, Version 1.1, Staged Representation (CMMI-SW, V1.1, Staged). Technical Report CMU/SEI-2002-TR-029, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesWang, J. and Carroll, J. (2011). Beyond fixing bugs: Case studies of creative collaboration in open source software bug fixing processes. In C and C 2011 - Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition, pages 397–398.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesWang, J., Shih, P. C., Wu, Y., and Carroll, J. M. (2015). Comparative case studies of open source software peer review practices. Information and Software Technology, 67:1–12.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesWei, K., Crowston, K., Eseryel, U., and Heckman, R. (2017). Roles and politeness behavior in community-based free/libre open source software development. Information & Management, 54(5):573–582.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesWu, J., Goh, K.-Y., and Tang, Q. C. (2007). Investigating Success of Open Source Software Projects: A Social Network Perspective. In ICIS.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesAndroutsellis-Theotokis, S., Spinellis, D., Kechagia, M., and Gousios, G. (2011). Open Source Software: A Survey from 10, 000 Feet. Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management, 4:187–347.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesXi, H., Xu, D., and Son, Y.-J. (2011). Dynamic scheduling and workforce assignment in open source software development. In 61st Annual IIE Conference and Expo Proceedings.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesXu, B., Lin, Z., and Xu, Y. (2011). A study of open source software development from control Perspective. Journal of Database Management, 22(1):26–42.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesYamakami, T. (2010). A stage model of evolution of open source software: Implications for the next stage of open source software development. In Proceeding - 6th InternationalConference on Digital Content, Multimedia Technology and Its Applications, IDC2010, pages 203–207.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesYamakami, T. (2011). A two-dimensional classification model of OSS: Towards successful management of the evolution of OSS. In International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, ICACT, pages 1336–1341.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesYan, J. and Wang, X. (2013). From open source to commercial software development - the community based software development model. In International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013): Reshaping Society Through Information Systems Design, volume 2, pages 1717–1736.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesZaimi, A., Ampatzoglou, A., Triantafyllidou, N., Chatzigeorgiou, A., Mavridis, A., Chaikalis, T., Deligiannis, I., Sfetsos, P., and Stamelos, I. (2015). An empirical study on the reuse of third-party libraries in open-source software development. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, volume 02-04-Sept.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesAversano, L., Guardabascio, D., and Tortorella, M. (2017). Evaluating the quality of the documentation of open source software. In ENASE 2017 - Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering, pages 308–313.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesBarbosa, O. and Alves, C. (2011). A Systematic Mapping Study on Software Ecosystems. Proceedings of the Workshop on Software Ecosystems 2011, pages 15–26.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesBarcellini, F., D´etienne, F., and Burkhardt, J.-M. (2007). Cross-Participants : fostering design-use mediation in an Open Source Software community. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(August):28–31.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesBatikas, M., Riera, M. O. i., and Mezquita, E. A. (2011). SME’s participation to Free Libre Open Source Software Communities. PhD thesis, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesBayona, S., Calvo-Manzano, J., Cuevas, G., and San Feliu, T. (2010). Taxonom´ıa de factores cr´ıticos para el despliegue de procesos software. Innovaci´on, Calidad e Ingenier´ıa del Software, 6(3):6.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesBergquist, M., Ljungberg, J., and Rolandsson, B. (2012). Justifying the value of open source. In ECIS 2012 - Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Information Systems.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesBerm´on-Angarita, L. (2010). Librer´ıa de activos para la gesti´on del conocimiento sobre procesos software: PAL-Wiki. PhD thesis, Carlos III de Madrid.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesCanfora, G. and Ruiz Gonz´alez, F. (2004). Procesos Software: caracter´ısticas, tecnolog´ıa y entornos. Nov´atica: Revista de la Asociaci´on de T´ecnicos de Inform´atica, (171):5–8.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesCastro Llanos, J. W. (2014). Incorporaci´on de la usabilidad en el proceso de desarrollo open source software. pages 1–422.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesCastro Llanos, J. W. and Acu˜na Castillo, S. T. (2012). Differences between traditional and open source development activities. 13th International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, PROFES 2012, 7343 LNCS:131–144.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesCaulkins, J. P., Feichtinger, G., Grass, D., Hartl, R. F., Kort, P. M., and Seidl, A. (2013). When to make proprietary software open source. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 37(6):1182–1194.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesChen, X. and Pan, Y.-H. (2013). The study of open source software collaborative user model based on social network and tag similarity. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 15(1):77–86.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesChung, E., Jensen, C., Yatani, K., Kuechler, V., and Truong, K. (2010). Sketching and drawing in the design of open source software. In Proceedings - 2010 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, VL/HCC 2010, pages 195–202.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesCossentino, M., Hilaire, V., and Seidita, V. (2014). The openup process. In Handbook on Agent-Oriented Design Processes, pages 491–566.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesCrowston, K., Lundell, I. H., Lindman, J., Lundell, B., and Robles, G. (2013). Proceedings of the Doctoral Consortium at the 9th International Conference on Open Source Systems, 2013. Number June.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesda Silva, A. C. e. B. a. G., de Paula, G. d. F. C. A. C. M., Monteiro, M. P., and Abreu, F. B. e. (2017). Agility and quality attributes in open source software projects release practices. In Proceedings - 2016 10th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, QUATIC 2016, pages 107–112.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesDaniel, S., Midha, V., Bhattacherhjee, A., and Singh, S. (2018). Sourcing knowledge in open source software projects: The impacts of internal and external social capital on project success. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesDaniel, S. and Stewart, K. (2016). Open source project success: Resource access, flow, and integration. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 25(3):159–176.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesDartsch, G. M. (2013). El software libre desde el punto de vista de las filosof´ıas de la multiplicidad. Question, 1.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesD´avila, A. (1995). Las perspectivas metodol´ogicas cualitativa y cuantitativa en las ciencias sociales. Madrid.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesDong, L., Liu, B., Li, Z., Xue, B., Chen, D., and Chen, T. (2018). Mining Handover Process in Open Source Development: An Exploratory Study. In Proceedings - Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, APSEC, volume 2017-Decem, pages 378–387.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesEscribano Luis, Y. and Mart´ınez, C. P. A. (2011). Estado de la pr´actica de la Ingenier´ıa de Requisitos en proyectos de Software Open Source. PhD thesis, Universidad Polit´ecnica de Catalu˜na, Barcelona, Espa˜na.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesEwenike, S., Benkhelifa, E., and Chibelushi, C. (2018). Cloud based collaborative software development: A review, gap analysis and future directions. In Proceedings of IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, AICCSA, volume 2017-Octob, pages 901–909.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesFarah, G. and Correal, D. (2013). Analysis of intercrossed open-source software repositories data in GitHub. In 2013 8th Computing Colombian Conference, 8CCC 2013.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesFarias, M., Novais, R., Ortins, P., Cola¸co, M., and Mendon¸ca, M. (2015). Analyzing distributions of emails and commits from OSS contributors through mining software repositories: An exploratory study. In ICEIS 2015 - 17th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Proceedings, volume 2, pages 303–310.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesFeitelson, D. G. (2012). Perpetual development: A model of the Linux kernel life cycle. Journal of Systems and Software, 85(4):859–875.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesFeller, J., Fitzgerald, B., Hissam, S. A., and Lakhani, K. R. (2005). Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software. Technical report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, London, England.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesFernandez, L. (2010). Innovaci´on, Calidad e Ingenier´ıa del Software. https://www.ati.es/IMG/pdf/MinoliVol6Num3.pdf, page 94.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesFilippova, A. and Cho, H. (2016). The effects and antecedents of conflict in free and open source software development. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW, volume 27, pages 705–716.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesForrester, E., Allen, J., Basili, V., Boehm, B., Cuevas, G., D ’, M., Khaled, A., Emam, E., Ferber, S., Fusani, M., Garcia, S., Goodenough, J., Graettinger, C., Jeffrey, R., Jung, H.-W., Kitchenham, B., Konrad, M., Kugler, H.-J., Lawson, A., Oktaba, H., Penn, L., Peterson, W., Raffo, D., Rombach, D., Rout, T., Srivastava, N., Wilkie, G., and Wohlin, C. (2006). The International Process Research Consortium: A Process Research Framework. Technical report, SEI.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesFranco-Bedoya, O., Ameller, D., Costal, D., and Franch, X. (2017). Open source software ecosystems: A Systematic mapping. Information and Software Technology, 91:160–185.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesFuggetta, A. (2000). Software Process: A Roadmap. Proceedings of the Conference on The Future of Software Engineering, International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 25–34.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesFuggetta, A. (2003). Open source software––an evaluation. Journal of Systems and Software, 66(1):77–90.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesGamalielsson, J., Lundell, B., Feist, J., Gustavsson, T., and Landqvist, F. (2015). On organisational influences in software standards and their open source implementations. Information and Software Technology, 67:30–43.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesGerea, M. M., Sørensen, C.-F., and Conradi, R. (2007). Selection of Open Source Components – A Qualitative Survey in Norwegian IT Industry. PhD thesis, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesGhapanchi, A., Aurum, A., and Daneshgar, F. (2012). The impact of process effectiveness on user interest in contributing to the open source software projects. Journal of Software, 7(1):212–219.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesGonzalez-Barahona, J., Izquierdo-Cortazar, D., and Squire, M. (2010). Repositories with public data about software development. International Journal of Open Source Software and Processes, 2(2):1–13.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesGonz´alez-Barahona, J. M. and Koch, S. (2005). El Software Libre al microscopio. Novatica, 175.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesGopal, D., Lindberg, A., and Lyytinen, K. (2016). Attributes of open source software requirements - The effect of the external environment and internal social structure. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, volume 2016-March, pages 4982–4991.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesGrottke, M., Karg, L., and Beckhaus, A. (2010). Team factors and failure processing efficiency: An exploratory study of closed and open source software development. In Proceedings - International Computer Software and Applications Conference, pages 188–197.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesHauge, Ø., Sørensen, C. F., and Røsdal, A. (2007). Surveying industrial roles in open source software development. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, 234:259–264.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesHernando Ram´ırez, A. F. and Anne Marie, Z.-V. (2012). Metodolog´ıa de la investigaci´on : m´as que una receta Research Methodology : More than a recipe. (20):91–111.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesHumphrey, W. S. (2000). The team software process (TSP). Software Engineering Institute, CMU/SEI-, (November):CMU/SEI–2000–TR–023.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesHumphrey, W. S. (2002). Personal Software Process (PSP). In Encyclopedia of Software Engineering.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesHuysmans, P., Ven, K., and Verelst, J. (2010). Using the DEMO methodology for modeling open source software development processes. Information and Software Technology, 52(6):656–671.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesIEEE (2006). IEEE 1074-2006: IEEE Standard for Developing a Software Project Life Cycle Process , volume 2006.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesISO/IEC (2008). TR 15504-6:2008 – Information technology – Process Assessment – Part 6: An exemplar system life cycle process assessment model.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesJoia, L. A. and dos Santos Vinhais, J. C. (2017). From closed source to open source software: Analysis of the migration process to Open Office. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 28(2):261–272.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesJongyindee, A., Ohira, M., Ihara, A., and Matsumoto, K.-I. (2012). Good or bad committers? - A case study of committer’s activities on the eclipse’s bug fixing process. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E95-D(9):2202–2210.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesJurado, F. and Rodriguez, P. (2015). Sentiment Analysis in monitoring software development processes: An exploratory case study on GitHub’s project issues. Journal of Systems and Software, 104:82–89.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesKeith, R. and Lawrence, C. (2015). PRINCE2 R Agile. Axelos, page 351.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesKhanjani, A. and Sulaiman, R. (2011). The aspects of choosing open source versus closed source. In ISCI 2011 - 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Informatics, pages 646–649.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesKon, F., Meirelles, P., and Lago, N. (2011). Free and Open Source Software Development and Research: Opportunities for Software Engineering. . . . Engineering (SBES) ..es_CO
dc.relation.referencesKumar, S. (2015). Using social network analysis to inform management of open source software development. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, volume 2015-March, pages 5154–5163.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesLi, X. and Zhou, F. (2018). The Relationship Between Process Variability and Structural Connectivity in Open Source Software Development. In ICIS 2017: Transforming Society with Digital Innovation.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesLin˚aker, J., Munir, H., Wnuk, K., and Mols, C. E. (2018). Motivating the contributions: An Open Innovation perspective on what to share as Open Source Software. Journal of Systems and Software, 135:17–36.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMa, X., Zhou, M., and Riehle, D. (2013). How commercial involvement affects open source projects: Three case studies on issue reporting. Science China Information Sciences, 56(8):1–13.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMagdaleno, A. M., de Oliveira Barros, M., Werner, C. M. L., de Araujo, R. M., and Batista, C. F. A. (2015). Collaboration optimization in software process composition. Journal of Systems and Software, 103:452–466.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMahmod, M. and Dahalin, Z. (2012). Women in open source software innovation process: Where are they? Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 11(1):113–129.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesManikas, K. and Hansen, K. M. (2013). Software ecosystems – A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 86(5):1294–1306.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMargan, D. and Candrlic, S. (2015). The success of open source software: A review. 2015 38th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), pages 1463–1468.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMatturro Mazoni, G. and Silva V´azquez, A. (2010). Modelo para la gesti´on de conocimiento y la experiencia integrada a las pr´acticas y procesos de desarrollo de software. PhD thesis, Universidad Polit´ecnica de Madrid, Madrid.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMeirelles, P., Wen, M., Terceiro, A., Siqueira, R., Kanashiro, L., and Neri, H. (2017). Brazilian public software portal: An integrated platform for collaborative development. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, OpenSym 2017.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesM´endez, R. d. C., Garc´ıa, C. E., and Giarratana, M. (2008). Management issues in open source software networks. PhD thesis, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Repositorio.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMidha, V. and Prashant, P. (2012). Factors Affecting the Success of Open Source Software. Journal of Systems and Software, 85(4):895–905.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMuruz´abal, I. O. and Castillo Acu˜na, S. T. (2014). El proceso de requisitos en el desarrollo de Open Source Software. Technical report, Escuela Politecnica Superior, Universidad Autonoma de Madird, Madrid.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesMutafelija, B. and Stromberg, H. (2008). Iso 12207. In Process Improvement with CMMI R v1.2 and ISO Standards, pages 321–357.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesNelson, M. L., Sen, R., and Subramaniam, C. (2006). Understanding open source software: a research classification framework. Communications of AIS, 17(12):2–37.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesObject Managemen Group (2008). Software & Systems Process Engineering Meta-Model Specification Verson 2.0. Technical Report April, Object Management Group.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesOkoli, C. and Carillo, K. (2013). Beyond open source software: Framework and implications for open content research. In ECIS 2013 - Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesOliveros, A. and Aguilera, S. (2012). Proyectos de Desarrollo de Software en ambientes cooperativos y colaborativos.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesPMI (2014). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge: PMBOK ( R ) Guide. 5th edition.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesPMI (2017). PMBOK Guide - 6th Edition, volume 40.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesPoo-Caama˜no, G., Knauss, E., Singer, L., and German, D. (2017). Herding cats in a FOSS ecosystem: a tale of communication and coordination for release management. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 8(1).es_CO
dc.relation.referencesPotdar, V. and Chang, E. (2004). Open source and closed source software development methodologies. Collaboration, Conflict and Control: The 4th Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering - 26th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 105–109.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesRaymond, E. S. (1997). The Cathedral and the Bazaar. (July 1997):1–35.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesRigby, P. C., German, D. M., and Storey, M.-A. (2008). Open source software peer review practices: a case study of the apache server. Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering, pages 541–550.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesRobles, G. and Gonz´alez-Barahona, J. M. (2012). A comprehensive study of software forks: Dates, reasons and outcomes. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 378 AICT:1–14.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesRolandsson, B., Bergquist, M., and Ljungberg, J. (2011). Open source in the firm: Opening up professional practices of software development. Research Policy, 40(4):576–587.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesRossi, M. (2004). Decoding the “ Free / Open Source ( F / OSS ) Software Puzzle ” a survey of theoretical and empirical contributions. The Economics of Open Source Software Development, (May 2004):40.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesRuiz Rube, I. and Dodero Beardo, J. M. (2013). Un framework para el despliegue y evaluaci´on de procesos software. PhD thesis, Universidad de C´adiz.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesRuiz-Rube, I. and Dodero Beardo, J. M. (2014). Un framework para el despliegue y evaluaci´on de procesos software. PhD thesis.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesSahu, T., Nagwani, N., and Verma, S. (2016). An empirical analysis on reducing open source software development tasks using stack overflow. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(21).es_CO
dc.relation.referencesScacchi, W. (2010). The future of research in Free/Open Source Software development. In Proceedings of the FSE/SDP Workshop on the Future of Software Engineering Research, FoSER 2010, pages 315–319.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesSchwaber Ken, S. J. (2017). The Scrum Guide — Scrum Guides.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesShaikh, M. and Henfridsson, O. (2017). Governing open source software through coordination processes. Information and Organization, 27(2):116–135.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesShimagaki, J., Kamei, Y., McIntosh, S., Pursehouse, D., and Ubayashi, N. (2017). Why are commits being reverted? A comparative study of industrial and open source projects. In Proceedings - 2016 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution, ICSME 2016, pages 301–311.es_CO
dc.relation.referencesSiau, K. and Tian, Y. (2013). Open source software development process model–a grounded theory approach. In 19th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2013 - Hyperconnected World: Anything, Anywhere, Anytime, volume 4, pages 2618–2628.es_CO
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2es_CO
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1es_CO
Aparece en las colecciones: Maestría en Gestión de Proyectos Informáticos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Esteban_2020_TG.pdfEsteban_2020_TG.pdf3,76 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.